In tree since 18 Sep 2010, no open bugs. Please do!
All ok on amd64 Andreas: I have seen that there isn't a keyword for x86; it does not work or has never been required? In the second case one might ask at x86 team to keywordreq so that it is also available for x86 ;)
I just never tested on x86, but I dont see any obvious reason why not to try. CC'ing x86, if you want, go ahead, try and keyword ~x86... (In reply to comment #1) > All ok on amd64 > > Andreas: > I have seen that there isn't a keyword for x86; it does not work or has never > been required? In the second case one might ask at x86 team to keywordreq so > that it is also available for x86 ;) >
Created attachment 251105 [details] Build log (In reply to comment #2) > I just never tested on x86, but I dont see any obvious reason why not to try. > CC'ing x86, if you want, go ahead, try and keyword ~x86... don't work. Is possible to fix?
Looks like a missing dependency. Please emerge media-libs/glitz and try again... (In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=251105) [details] > Build log > > (In reply to comment #2) > > CC'ing x86, if you want, go ahead, try and keyword ~x86... > don't work. Is possible to fix? >
(In reply to comment #4) > Looks like a missing dependency. Please emerge media-libs/glitz and try > again... uhm, sorry I have not seen the log carefully. Anyway it runs well on x86, but on amd64 i compile it without glitz. Please edit the ebuild to make sure that if you are on x86 to be added glitz to DEPEND
x86, please ignore this package for now. Will figure the issue out and then keyword myself... amd64, please go ahead for now.
(In reply to comment #6) > amd64, please go ahead for now. > Already ok for me :)
Just FYI, the dependency is not missing on amd64. I checked and none of the final binaries link to glitz.
(In reply to comment #8) > Just FYI, the dependency is not missing on amd64. I checked and none of the > final binaries link to glitz. > I'm agree, compilation is successful without glitz
amd64 done. Thanks Agostino
OK then lets close this one.