Ceph is a distributed network file system designed to provide excellent performance, reliability, and scalability. More information: http://ceph.newdream.net/about/ It's definitely not ready for production use yet, but is very promising. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Created attachment 247959 [details] ceph 0.21.2 ebuild
Created attachment 247961 [details] ceph.initd
Created attachment 247963 [details] ceph.confd
Created attachment 247964 [details] ceph live ebuild (unstable branch)
Hello, The Gentoo Team would like to firstly thank you for your ebuild submission. We also apologize for not being able to accommodate you in a timely manner. There are simply too many new packages. Allow me to use this opportunity to introduce you to Gentoo Sunrise. The sunrise overlay[1] is a overlay for Gentoo which we allow trusted users to commit to and all users can have ebuilds reviewed by Gentoo devs for entry into the overlay. So, the sunrise team is suggesting that you look into this and submit your ebuild to the overlay where even *you* can commit to. =) Thanks, On behalf of the Gentoo Sunrise Team, Michał. [1]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/sunrise/ [2]: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq
Actualy there were already ceph ebuild in science overlay =) but thank you for initscripts =) After testing i'll add it to tree under sys-cluster/ceph
You put in DEPEND many packages, i'm wondering is they trully needed? I mean: sys-devel/libtool - this is part @system set, can be dropped dev-vcs/git - this isn't live ebuild dev-lang/perl - i can't find any perl script nor perl module sys-libs/gdbm - no bin is linking to gdbm radosgw? ( dev-libs/fcgi dev-libs/expat ) - does expat is really needed? i can't find any binary linked to it sys-fs/btrfs-progs - the same, ceph doesn't link to btrfs, and can work without it. Thanks.
If there is no patching, eautoreconf isn't needed, econf doesn't need "||die". Ceph is still experimental filesystem, maybe USE flag "debug" would be usefull?
(In reply to comment #7) > You put in DEPEND many packages, i'm wondering is they trully needed? I mean: > sys-devel/libtool - this is part @system set, can be dropped dropped > dev-vcs/git - this isn't live ebuild I haven't found it in overlay's version > dev-lang/perl - i can't find any perl script nor perl module > sys-libs/gdbm - no bin is linking to gdbm dropped (those were specified in ceph.desc as required to build ) > radosgw? ( dev-libs/fcgi dev-libs/expat ) - does expat is really needed? both are needed: janus02 ~ # qlist sys-cluster/ceph | xargs scanelf -L -n -q -F '%n #F' | tr , ' ' | xargs qfile -C | sort -u dev-libs/expat (/usr/lib/libexpat.so.1) dev-libs/fcgi (/usr/lib/libfcgi.so.0) dev-libs/libedit (/lib/libedit.so.0) dev-libs/openssl (/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0) sys-cluster/ceph (/usr/lib/libcrush.so.1) sys-cluster/ceph (/usr/lib/librados.so.1) sys-fs/fuse (/usr/lib/libfuse.so.2) > sys-fs/btrfs-progs - the same, ceph doesn't link to btrfs, and can work without it. scripts use them, cannot be made optional, so I left it as RDEP (In reply to comment #8) > If there is no patching, eautoreconf isn't needed, econf doesn't need "||die". > Ceph is still experimental filesystem, maybe USE flag "debug" would be usefull? All done, unfortunately eautoreconf is necessary now ;)
Great:) Maybe could you bump version to 0.22.2?
(In reply to comment #10) > Great:) Maybe could you bump version to 0.22.2? Ehh, should have checked that before patching 0.22... Thanks! +*ceph-0.22.2 (03 Nov 2010) + + 03 Nov 2010; Kacper Kowalik <xarthisius@gentoo.org> -ceph-0.22-r1.ebuild, + +ceph-0.22.2.ebuild, +files/ceph-0.22.2-asneeded.patch, + -files/ceph-0.22-asneeded.patch: + Version bump. Thanks to Marcin Mirosław <bug@mejor.pl> for the report. + Drop old.
Thanks.
Added to tree
