Bug 337160 – Stabilize dev-libs/nettle-2.1

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2010-09-13 21:08:39 UTC]

Stabilize dev-libs/nettle-2.1

[Comment 1 David Abbott (RETIRED) 2010-09-14 23:37:06 UTC]

All good x86.

[Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2010-09-15 13:21:10 UTC]

dev-lang/pike will not build with any version of dev-libs/nettle-2*, so stabilisation is moot.  However, there is a version not-yet-in-tree available that claims to support it.  Removing all arches, until this is resolved...

[Comment 3 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2011-03-25 01:20:55 UTC]

Nettle is the default crypto backend of GnuTLS 2.12.

[Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo 2011-03-25 11:02:38 UTC]

amd64 ok

[Comment 5 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) 2011-03-25 12:03:02 UTC]

amd64 done. Thanks Agostino

[Comment 6 Andreas Schürch 2011-03-25 12:16:33 UTC]

Faulis complaint is still true here! 
There is no version of dev-lang/pike in the tree that builds with dev-libs/nettle-2.1!

[Comment 7 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2011-03-25 18:15:28 UTC]

(In reply to comment #6)

dev-libs/nettle-2.0 is already stable, so it's natural to stabilize dev-libs/nettle-2.1.

[Comment 8 Andreas Schürch 2011-03-25 18:25:57 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> 
> dev-libs/nettle-2.0 is already stable, so it's natural to stabilize
> dev-libs/nettle-2.1.
Yes, but if someone installs pike, it will alway downgrade nettle again...

[Comment 9 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2011-03-26 16:14:32 UTC]

(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > (In reply to comment #6)
> > 
> > dev-libs/nettle-2.0 is already stable, so it's natural to stabilize
> > dev-libs/nettle-2.1.
> Yes, but if someone installs pike, it will alway downgrade nettle again...

 So, file a stabilisation request for newer pike.  If I am not mistaken this should break the vicious circle.

[Comment 10 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) 2011-03-26 20:58:08 UTC]

Stable on alpha.

[Comment 11 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2011-03-27 19:06:52 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 12 Andreas Schürch 2011-03-28 05:10:52 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > (In reply to comment #7)
> > > (In reply to comment #6)
> > > 
> > > dev-libs/nettle-2.0 is already stable, so it's natural to stabilize
> > > dev-libs/nettle-2.1.
> > Yes, but if someone installs pike, it will alway downgrade nettle again...
> 
>  So, file a stabilisation request for newer pike.  If I am not mistaken this
> should break the vicious circle.
Unfortunately the newest version in the tree (although just ~x86 atm) is also the latest upstream and it carries a DEPEND="<=dev-libs/nettle-2.0" with it.
Pike itself doesn't have stable rdeps... so maybe it would be the best to also drop stable on pike for the moment?!

[Comment 13 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2011-03-28 19:30:45 UTC]

(In reply to comment #12)
> Unfortunately the newest version in the tree (although just ~x86 atm) is also
> the latest upstream and it carries a DEPEND="<=dev-libs/nettle-2.0" with it.
> Pike itself doesn't have stable rdeps... so maybe it would be the best to also
> drop stable on pike for the moment?!

 Ok, so I checked again.  The newest pike is compatible with 2.0, so it should go stable anyway.  I haven't checked if nettle 2.1 is covered, too. So:

Newer pike has to go stable.
Newer nettle only if it works with pike.

[Comment 14 Andreas Schürch 2011-03-28 19:39:59 UTC]

(In reply to comment #13)

>  Ok, so I checked again.  The newest pike is compatible with 2.0, so it should
> go stable anyway.  I haven't checked if nettle 2.1 is covered, too. So:
> 
> Newer pike has to go stable.
> Newer nettle only if it works with pike.

I tried to build the newest pike once with nettle-2.1 (modified the ebuild to not downgrade...) without any luck! :-(

[Comment 15 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2011-03-30 17:13:02 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 16 Michael Weber (RETIRED) 2011-04-04 07:20:33 UTC]

arm/sparc stable

[Comment 17 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2011-05-02 16:25:48 UTC]

ppc64 stable    (as dev-lang/pike is not even keyworded for the arch, the issues raised here don't concern us)

[Comment 18 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) 2011-07-20 13:35:26 UTC]

x86 will pass.

[Comment 19 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2011-07-24 10:28:22 UTC]

ia64/s390/sh stable, closing