First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 32906
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Brian Jackson (RETIRED) <iggy@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Jacob Smullyan <smulloni@smullyan.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 32906 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 32906 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-11-06 13:58 0000 
The summary just about says it.  It appears to be done very deliberately, but I
 can't think of a reason to install the binary in /etc/init.d.  I think those
two lines in the ebuild:

        exeinto /etc/init.d
        doexe ipvsadm

should just come out.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

------- Comment #1 From Brian Jackson (RETIRED) 2003-11-09 07:29:56 0000 ------- 
sorry, that is mine ;)

------- Comment #2 From Brian Jackson (RETIRED) 2003-11-12 14:00:29 0000 ------- 
I think that was supposed to be ipvsadm.sh which is a startup script. I went
ahead and wrote a Gentoo'ized startup script for ipvsadm. Give the mirrors a
while to update and then give it a try. I havent' bumped it yet, I want to get
somebody else to test it. So let me know if it works okay for you.

------- Comment #3 From Jacob Smullyan 2003-11-14 12:30:41 0000 ------- 
You have a nasty typo in the stable ebuild now -- after

  exeinto /etc/init.d/

you have 

   newbin ${FILESDIR}/ipvsadm-init ipvsadm

which puts your runscript into  /bin/ipvsadm, masking the real ipvsadm in /sbin.  This needs fixin'!  If anyone has a script running that calls ipvsadm without the full path and reinstalls for some reason, they'll be unhappy.

Also, your init script, which you cloned from iptables, still refers to iptables where it means to say ipvsadm in an eerror message.

------- Comment #4 From Brian Jackson (RETIRED) 2003-11-14 12:58:26 0000 ------- 
good catch, it's supposed to be newexe, fixed that and the init script in cvs

------- Comment #5 From Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) 2003-12-07 07:43:26 0000 ------- 
so we can close it ;)
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug