Bug 317981 – Stable request for mail-filter/opendkim-2.0.4

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2010-05-01 08:30:29 UTC]

I have been using opendkim for months now to sign email on my personal server and it seems to be working. How about having a stable version?

[Comment 1 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2010-05-01 08:33:21 UTC]

The version I am currently using is 1.2.2-r1.

[Comment 2 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2010-05-01 08:47:34 UTC]

With 1.2.2-r1 there seems to be a bug that ADSP discard is not working. Seems to be working after upgrading to 2.0.2. By reading RELEASE_NOTES 2.0.1 is probably good too. I tested it with telnet and trying to put [e-mail] to From as paypal.com as adsp in place. You should get:

550 5.7.1 rejected due to DKIM ADSP evaluation

[Comment 3 Daniel Black (RETIRED) 2010-05-13 13:32:21 UTC]

The LIBOPENDKIM bug fixed in 2.0.2 also was fairly significant.

I'm tempted to go for the 2.0.4 release coming out this week which has a few small bug fixes on 2.0.3.

http://opendkim.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opendkim/RELEASE_NOTES?revision=1.113.2.39&view=markup&pathrev=br-2-0

I could be a bit biased being an upstream dev here too.

Thanks for the bug report requesting something that's being nagging (weakly) at the bottom of my todo list.

[Comment 4 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) 2010-07-06 17:55:34 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> The LIBOPENDKIM bug fixed in 2.0.2 also was fairly significant.
> 
> I'm tempted to go for the 2.0.4 release coming out this week which has a few
> small bug fixes on 2.0.3.
> 

Add arches for 2.0.4?

[Comment 5 Daniel Black (RETIRED) 2010-07-18 04:12:55 UTC]

ATs - opendkim has a fairly comprehensive test suite. There are some bugs where configuration options were badly formatted but I haven't seen any significant bugs since the 2.0.4 release.

[Comment 6 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2010-07-18 09:43:01 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 7 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) 2010-07-18 16:38:50 UTC]

amd64 done