devicekit-disks has been renamed UDisks and version 1.0.0 has been released. Note that this needs a lvm2 bump to 2.02.61 for it.
Created attachment 223877 [details] ebuild for udisks (from devicekit-disks)
Created attachment 223883 [details] fix duplicate dep
It also completely breaks API/ABI/dbus interfaces, and it's only consumer is gnome-disk-utility-2.29.90. This will be added when GNOME 2.30 is added to tree. Leaving the bug open to prevent duplicates.
* These packages depend on devicekit-disks: gnome-extra/sensors-applet-2.2.5 (dbus ? sys-apps/devicekit-disks) sys-apps/gnome-disk-utility-2.28.0 (>=sys-apps/devicekit-disks-007) sys-apps/gnome-disk-utility-2.28.1 (>=sys-apps/devicekit-disks-007) sys-apps/gnome-disk-utility-2.28.1 (>=sys-apps/devicekit-disks-007) well it's the current unstable sensors-applet. The upgrade wouldn't hurt that much.
Yeah, well, we need this in tree for xfce4-power-manager (the version in package.mask already could use udisks/upower, but the ebuild is unfinished because these are missing)
And actually gnome-disk-utility 2.30 is out since last week
http://svn.xmw.de/websvn/gentoo-overlay/sys-apps/udisks/udisks-1.0.0.ebuild works for me, but needs http://svn.xmw.de/websvn/gentoo-overlay/sys-fs/lvm2/lvm2-2.02.61.ebuild (In reply to comment #6) > And actually gnome-disk-utility 2.30 is out since last week http://svn.xmw.de/websvn/gentoo-overlay/sys-apps/gnome-disk-utility/gnome-disk-utility-2.30.1.ebuild looks nice.
+*udisks-1.0.0 (07 Apr 2010) + + 07 Apr 2010; Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> +udisks-1.0.0.ebuild: + Initial commit wrt #309759 by Marc-Antoine Perennou.
Did you p.mask this Samuli? It needs lvm2 2.02.61 which doesn't seem to be in portage yet - we've got this in the Gnome overlay due to it being required for 2.30 support (and can you add the keywords from the gnome overlay as well, or can I?)
Mmmm, you also moved it from sys-apps to sys-fs - please please please don't do this - it is a direct replacement for devicekit-disks, thankfully, nothing in the tree actually depends on it, so it should be safe to move it to sys-apps.
sys-fs is more targeted directory for it... but this needs to be reverted asap: 09 Apr 2010; Steev Klimaszewski <steev@gentoo.org> udisks-1.0.0.ebuild, metadata.xml: udisks: Change the autoconf flag to remote-access The remote-access is more appropriate as this flag is regarding whether or not remote machines should be allowed to connect to you. we have a global use flag for this, zeroconf, no need to invent more for the same purpose.
