* Applying opendkim-2.0.0-lua-ldap.patch ... * Failed Patch: opendkim-2.0.0-lua-ldap.patch ! * ( /usr/portage/mail-filter/opendkim/files/opendkim-2.0.0-lua-ldap.patch ) * Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. emerge opendkim 2. 3. Actual Results: # cat /var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/opendkim-2.0.0/temp/opendkim-2.0.0-lua-ldap.patch.out ***** opendkim-2.0.0-lua-ldap.patch ***** ========================================= PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/mail-filter/opendkim/files/opendkim-2.0.0-lua-ldap.patch' ========================================= patching file configure.ac Hunk #1 FAILED at 3. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file configure.ac.rej ========================================= PATCH COMMAND: patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/mail-filter/opendkim/files/opendkim-2.0.0-lua-ldap.patch' ========================================= missing header for unified diff at line 9 of patch can't find file to patch at input line 9 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: configure.ac |=================================================================== |RCS file: /cvsroot/opendkim/configure.ac,v |retrieving revision 1.139 |retrieving revision 1.140 |diff -u -b -B -r1.139 -r1.140 |--- configure.ac 3 Mar 2010 16:32:55 -0000 1.139 |+++ configure.ac 7 Mar 2010 17:17:57 -0000 1.140 -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored ========================================= PATCH COMMAND: patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/mail-filter/opendkim/files/opendkim-2.0.0-lua-ldap.patch' ========================================= missing header for unified diff at line 9 of patch can't find file to patch at input line 9 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: configure.ac |=================================================================== |RCS file: /cvsroot/opendkim/configure.ac,v |retrieving revision 1.139 |retrieving revision 1.140 |diff -u -b -B -r1.139 -r1.140 |--- configure.ac 3 Mar 2010 16:32:55 -0000 1.139 |+++ configure.ac 7 Mar 2010 17:17:57 -0000 1.140 -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored ========================================= PATCH COMMAND: patch -p3 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/mail-filter/opendkim/files/opendkim-2.0.0-lua-ldap.patch' ========================================= missing header for unified diff at line 9 of patch can't find file to patch at input line 9 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: configure.ac |=================================================================== |RCS file: /cvsroot/opendkim/configure.ac,v |retrieving revision 1.139 |retrieving revision 1.140 |diff -u -b -B -r1.139 -r1.140 |--- configure.ac 3 Mar 2010 16:32:55 -0000 1.139 |+++ configure.ac 7 Mar 2010 17:17:57 -0000 1.140 -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored ========================================= PATCH COMMAND: patch -p4 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/usr/portage/mail-filter/opendkim/files/opendkim-2.0.0-lua-ldap.patch' ========================================= missing header for unified diff at line 9 of patch can't find file to patch at input line 9 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: configure.ac |=================================================================== |RCS file: /cvsroot/opendkim/configure.ac,v |retrieving revision 1.139 |retrieving revision 1.140 |diff -u -b -B -r1.139 -r1.140 |--- configure.ac 3 Mar 2010 16:32:55 -0000 1.139 |+++ configure.ac 7 Mar 2010 17:17:57 -0000 1.140 -------------------------- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 2 out of 2 hunks ignored Expected Results: I expect emerge to complete with success
fixed - caught again by $id tags in patches. Thanks for the bug report.
