Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 30462
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: TEST-REQUEST
Assigned To: Gentoo Science Related Packages <sci@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Derek Dolney <nospam@dolney.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
blas-19940131-r1.ebuild blas-19940131-r1.ebuild text/plain Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:37 0000 2.01 KB Details
Makefile Makefile text/plain Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:38 0000 2.23 KB Details
f77-reference f77-reference text/plain Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:38 0000 396 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 30462 depends on: 30454 Show dependency tree
Bug 30462 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-10-05 20:37 0000 
This ebuild will build a BLAS shared library from the netlib reference
implementation. Please see comments in bug 30453.

It depends on the blas-config tool submitted as bug 30454.

I don't know why the current app-sci/blas ebuild is versioned as 19980702. There
is no indication of this date on the webpage or in the code. The code suggests
the last modification occurred on 1/31/1994.

I've tested building with and without USE="ifc". Either way, I can link to the resulting libraries with g77 or ifc.

------- Comment #1 From Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:37:41 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=18840) [details]
blas-19940131-r1.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:38:02 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=18841) [details]
Makefile

------- Comment #3 From Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:38:37 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=18842) [details]
f77-reference

Profile for blas-config (see bug 30454)

------- Comment #4 From George Shapovalov 2003-10-28 17:53:35 0000 ------- 
In portage, please test.

Will stay package-masked until all blas related changes are ready.

George

------- Comment #5 From George Shapovalov 2004-02-01 19:22:01 0000 ------- 
As per our discussion on how to name packages I moved blas-19940131 to
blas-reference-19940131. I had to adjust SRC_URI (it used $PN) but that was the
only adjustment. It installs the same way, so no other modifications seem to be
necessary to make it work with blas-config, still I would appreciate a quick
test ;).
I adjusted package.mask correspondingly as well..

George

------- Comment #6 From Derek Dolney 2004-02-04 10:41:30 0000 ------- 
I've tested the new ebuild in portage with and without ifc use. It works both
ways.

George wrote:
> it is nice to be able to run multiple install's after just one compile.

Good point. Am I mistaken in that we should not declare RPATH inside
src_compile() since it is also used in src_install()?
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug