First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 29896
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Text-Markup Team <text-markup@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Vaclav Slavik <vslavik@fastmail.fm>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 29896 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 29896 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2003-09-29 06:07 0000
app-test/docbook-xsl-stylesheets ebuild is written in such way that manpages
subdirectory (with stylesheets for docbook2man conversion) is not installed.
This is obviously done on some purpose and not by mistake, because 1.62.0 ebuild
contains this comment:

        # manpages are excluded here because they arent fully supported
        for i in common extensions fo html htmlhelp images javahelp lib template
xhtml

I don't know what "not fully supported" means exactly (I didn't find any info in
bugzilla, Google or forums), they always seemed to work for me back on Mandrake
system and they do work if I modify the ebuild. OTOH, there are several reasons
to include it:
- it works without any problems at least in simple cases and so is genuinely useful
- it's part of the upstream package, the authors included it for a reason
- this omission breaks software that depends on docbook-to-man conversion, e.g.
  it's impossible to regenerate docs from CVS sources of Bakefile 
  (bakefile.sourceforge.net)

Can the manpages backend be added back please?

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

------- Comment #1 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2003-09-29 19:44:55 0000 -------
okay, well first the explanation of my 'fully supported' comment. 

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=468779&group_id=21935&atid=373749
is a brief few posts to read

what i really meant was, do the manpages stylesheets 'fully support' the
conversion, there seem to be some .xsl's missing compared with the tools
to do conversion to other formats. and it seems, from you, that they do support
conversion fine in simple cases. which should alleviate my worries. they
just have a 'tacked on' nature about them to me. there is no mention of them
in any of the docs README/ChangeLog/WhatsNew etc.

however in light of all this, i dont have any particular opposition to adding
them, and so it seems that as they work, i will.

thanks for your bug, i've fixed 1.62.0 in portage.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug