A new version of bluefish is available. It has been marked by the bluefish devs as the new stable branch. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: I have revised the ebuild, mostly changed the URI, adjusted the dependencies according to the info on the URL I provided above and also added a new use flag for gucharmap support. I have made some basic tests but I can't be sure that everything will be fine, so corrections and suggestions will be welcome.
Created attachment 213990 [details] bluefish-2.0.0_rc1.ebuild
@Jesús: Please assign bugs yourself next time.
Initial impressions favourable here. Nice to see Bluefish actually remembering some preferences I've set! Thanks for the ebuild.
+*bluefish-2.0.0_rc1 (22 Jan 2010) + + 22 Jan 2010; Daniel Pielmeier <billie@gentoo.org> -bluefish-1.3.7.ebuild, + +bluefish-2.0.0_rc1.ebuild, + +files/bluefish-2.0.0_rc1-gucharmap-automagic.patch: + Version bump. Fixes Bug #298146. Thanks to Jesús Guerrero for reporting. + Remove old. @Jesús: Thanks for your report. I have one question though. Why did you not use the latest version 1.3.8 as base for your ebuild?
(In reply to comment #4) > +*bluefish-2.0.0_rc1 (22 Jan 2010) > + > + 22 Jan 2010; Daniel Pielmeier <billie@gentoo.org> -bluefish-1.3.7.ebuild, > + +bluefish-2.0.0_rc1.ebuild, > + +files/bluefish-2.0.0_rc1-gucharmap-automagic.patch: > + Version bump. Fixes Bug #298146. Thanks to Jesús Guerrero for reporting. > + Remove old. > > @Jesús: Thanks for your report. I have one question though. Why did you not > use the latest version 1.3.8 as base for your ebuild? > I usually pick the latest available one. I have no idea which one I used at that point, since it was some weeks ago and my memory is not that good. If it wasn't the latest available one then it was probably a confusion on my side. If there had been any important reason then I'd probably remember it, but I don't hehe.
(In reply to comment #5) > > I usually pick the latest available one. I have no idea which one I used at > that point, since it was some weeks ago and my memory is not that good. If it > wasn't the latest available one then it was probably a confusion on my side. If > there had been any important reason then I'd probably remember it, but I don't > hehe. > Well the header from your ebuild says bluefish-1.3.2 and at the time you posted the bug bluefish-1.3.8 was already in the tree. :) I was a bit confused myself thus the remark.