Bug 297503 – Stable =media-video/gpac-0.4.5-r1

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2009-12-19 11:28:57 UTC]

One line difference to 0.4.5 which has been in tree since 31 Jan 2009. 
No known regressions.

Please test & mark stable.

[Comment 1 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) 2009-12-20 16:12:17 UTC]

Created attachment 213579 [details, diff]
declare glx function prototype

Ok there was an error on amd64 system

 * QA Notice: Files built without respecting LDFLAGS have been detected
 *  Please include the following list of files in your report:         
 * /usr/lib64/gpac/gm_jack.so                                          
 * /usr/lib64/gpac/gm_alsa.so                                          
 * /usr/lib64/gpac/gm_oss_audio.so                                     
 * /usr/lib64/gpac/gm_pulseaudio.so                                    


 * QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
 *            fine but exhibit random runtime failures.               
 * compositor/visual_manager_3d_gl.c:102: warning: implicit declaration of function 'glXGetProcAddress'
 * compositor/visual_manager_3d_gl.c:102: warning: implicit declaration of function 'glXGetProcAddress'

 * 
 * QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
 *            but will almost certainly crash on 64bit architectures.
 *
 * Function `glXGetProcAddress' implicitly converted to pointer at compositor/visual_manager_3d_gl.c:102
 * Function `glXGetProcAddress' implicitly converted to pointer at compositor/visual_manager_3d_gl.c:102
 *
 *  Please file a bug about this at http://bugs.gentoo.org/
 *  with the maintaining herd of the package.

I created the trivial patch, committed it, and stabled the package. This patch wont affect the package in anyway. It is just a trivial way to make sure that gcc will compile and interprets the falling function correctly

So, to sum up. Stable on amd64

[Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2010-01-01 16:16:00 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 3 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2010-01-06 19:11:10 UTC]

ppc64 done

[Comment 4 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2010-01-07 18:28:45 UTC]

ppc done

[Comment 5 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) 2010-01-23 16:25:51 UTC]

Stable on alpha.

[Comment 6 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2010-01-31 15:59:13 UTC]

sparc stable, closing

[Comment 7 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2010-01-31 16:28:04 UTC]

Reopening.

(In reply to comment #1)
> So, to sum up. Stable on amd64

gpac-0.4.5-r1.ebuild:KEYWORDS="alpha ~amd64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd"

?

[Comment 8 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) 2010-01-31 16:38:10 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> Reopening.
> 
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > So, to sum up. Stable on amd64
> 
> gpac-0.4.5-r1.ebuild:KEYWORDS="alpha ~amd64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd"
> 
> ?
> 
Sorry I failed

Marked stable now on amd64