Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 289070 - mail-client/claws-mail-3.7.3 (version bump)
Summary: mail-client/claws-mail-3.7.3 (version bump)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED)
URL: http://www.claws-mail.org/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-10-14 16:48 UTC by Salim
Modified: 2010-02-04 18:29 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Salim 2009-10-14 16:48:02 UTC
Please bump claws mail to version 3.7.3.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-10-14 20:38:41 UTC
9th October 2009 Claws Mail 3.7.3

CLAWS MAIL RELEASE NOTES
http://www.claws-mail.org

Claws Mail is a GTK+ based, user-friendly, lightweight, and fast 
email client.

New in this release:


The user is now warned when inserting a large file in the message
body. The value of 'large' can be configured on the Compose/Writing
page of the Preferences.

Added 'has_attachment' and 'signed' matcher expressions to
Filtering and Processing Flags lists.

Support Reply prefixes of French Yahoo mail and French Lotus Notes.

Enabled Page Size and Orientation configuration in the print dialog.
GTK+ 2.18 or newer only.

tools/convert_mbox.pl
Add -R flag to support recursive conversions of arbitrary Evolution
mail folders.

Updated user manual.

Updated Brazilian Portuguese, Czech, French, German, Hungarian,
Indonesian, Japanese, and Polish translations.

Bug fixes:
o bug 1949, 'Spell checker doesn't recognise certain word in
Subject header, but does in message body'
o bug 1951, 'C-Mail dumps core when editing displayed
headers'
o bug 1952, 'Deleted mails in Queue folder highlight it'
o bug 1954, 'Segfault on reading wrong STATUS'
o bug 1957, 'LDAP errs out after searching too many search
bases'
o bug 1966, '"Collapse all threads" slower than "Expand all
threads"'
o bug 1967, 'Claws gets stuck after accepting a certificate
warning dialog'
o bug 1969, 'Bad guess for outgoing encoding'
o bug 1984, 'Claws Mail does not support the anwser prefix
used by French Lotus Notes'
o bug 1994, 'Changing colors required restart.'
o bug 2003, 'Address gathering dialog minor bugs/annoyances'
o bug 2006, 'Non-utf8 strftime(3) date strings shows up
garbled in GUI'
o bug 2007, 'Small memory leaks'
o bug 2008, 'Claws-Mail doesn't refresh after deletion'
o bug 2009, 'Incorrect pointer representation with GTK+2.18'
o Debian bug 530057: 'claws-mail-tools: bashism in /bin/sh
script'
o Redhat bug 512024, 'folder.c:3543 Condition
msglist != NULL failed'
o fix displaying Base64 parts with decoding errors (parts
without errors get displayed)
o fix disappearing folderview icons on main toolbar update
o fix crash on non-existent LDAP server
o fix toolbar spacing that breaks dark themes

For further details of the numbered bugs listed above consult
http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/index.cgi
Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-10-18 09:07:26 UTC
To be updated plugins:

bsfilter_plugin-1.0.2
fancy-0.9.8
gtkhtml2_viewer-0.25
notification_plugin-0.23
perl_plugin-0.9.16
vcalendar-2.0.6
tnef_parse-0.3.6

Will come to it the next couple of days.
Comment 3 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-10-18 09:32:42 UTC
There is a new python plugin out...that should be added, too.
Comment 4 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-10-18 23:49:07 UTC
Thanks for the notice, everything has been bumped now.
Comment 5 michael higgins 2010-01-06 19:29:19 UTC
What is going on? This is *STILL MASKED*??? Did someone drop the ball, or what? I'm like, about to be filing a report to claws developers and for the very first time my claws-mail is out of date.

Please, a DEV, please reply as to why is this version bump was not taken care of promptly as in the past?

And for the love of all holy and good -- if the package is masked, please leave the bug OPEN until it's not...???
Comment 6 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-01-06 21:02:12 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> What is going on? This is *STILL MASKED*??? Did someone drop the ball, or what?
> I'm like, about to be filing a report to claws developers and for the very
> first time my claws-mail is out of date.

 You are doing something wrong.  On friday a new version will be released anyway.

> Please, a DEV, please reply as to why is this version bump was not taken care
> of promptly as in the past?

 It has been.

> And for the love of all holy and good -- if the package is masked, please leave
> the bug OPEN until it's not...???

 It is not masked.  I checked my eix output, http://packages.gentoo.org/package/mail-client/claws-mail, my local mask files, mask files on sources.gentoo.org and nowhere a mask of anything claws related is to be found.  Your turn.
Comment 7 michael higgins 2010-01-07 00:11:45 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > What is going on? This is *STILL MASKED*??? Did someone drop the ball, or what?
> > I'm like, about to be filing a report to claws developers and for the very
> > first time my claws-mail is out of date.
> 
>  You are doing something wrong.

Oh, good. I was, obviously, very worried.

>  On friday a new version will be released
> anyway.

And there you go. I'll look forward to that real soon, then. ;-)
Comment 8 michael higgins 2010-01-07 00:52:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > (In reply to comment #5)
> > > What is going on? This is *STILL MASKED*??? Did someone drop the ball, or what?
> > > I'm like, about to be filing a report to claws developers and for the very
> > > first time my claws-mail is out of date.
> > 
> >  You are doing something wrong.
> 
> Oh, good. I was, obviously, very worried.
> 
> >  On friday a new version will be released
> > anyway.
> 
> And there you go. I'll look forward to that real soon, then. ;-)
> 

Still... just curious and all. I just sync'd and no joy. So a diff of claws-mail-3.7.2.ebuild to 3.7.3-r1 gives me:
 
< KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd"
---
> KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~hppa ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86 ~x86-fbsd"

Which is why is still seems unavailable to me. So, either my sync is bunk, or the ebuild isn't stable, but rather, now "testing" for everyone? I don't know for sure, but I'm doing my best to understand what has changed in the system. Now it's got a keyword mask?

I'm not a dev, so I have to Google... "keyword mask". Sure enough, yeah, this package is still, like, "masked". Without my coffee in hand, it loses caps and splats, but still... so, like -- I guess, uh "your turn"? ;-)
Comment 9 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-01-07 13:21:30 UTC
Ok, a classical misunderstanding.  I thought you were talking about the ebuild being "hard masked", which it is not.  It is normally masked by the testing keyword.  My plans for stabilisation have been pushed back by bugs in between and a delayed amd64 keywording of some plugins which should go stable, too.  Now the new version is announced and I will do that to avoid too much work on the stabilisation teams.

Don't worry, Claws is still well-maintained in Gentoo.
Comment 10 michael higgins 2010-02-03 19:57:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> Ok, a classical misunderstanding.  I thought you were talking about the ebuild
> being "hard masked", which it is not.  It is normally masked by the testing
> keyword.  My plans for stabilisation have been pushed back by bugs in between
> and a delayed amd64 keywording of some plugins which should go stable, too. 
> Now the new version is announced and I will do that to avoid too much work on
> the stabilisation teams.
> 
> Don't worry, Claws is still well-maintained in Gentoo.
> 

Well, I, but... it's not... like... it used to be. Here we are, new version is... 3.7.5 and I have... 3.7.2 still? What is the deal? Are you all running ~* so don't notice or care, or can I have some x86 stabilized to current? Don't care about amd64, or any plugins. Can't you stabilize C-M for x86 whatever the problems with amd64?

Or, just say you won't, don't care, (whatever), but please just tell me if in fact I'll now have to go "unstable" for claws (gah, and dependencies too probably) if I don't want to keep looking at old bugs and still have missing features. 

Or, do I have to file a new Gentoo bug to get a clue as to what is going on? I'm, like, not party to your IRC chats, you know? So can you elaborate a bit on what's going on? 

And why is this bug *closed* if 3.7.2 is still the latest "stable" version in "the tree"? Resolved "fixed", even? (/me goes to tear out some more hair, muttering "WTF, WTF, WTF...") 

Available versions:  3.7.2 ~3.7.3-r1 ~3.7.4 ( -- to show I'm not lying, just synched this morning.) 3.7.2 is the only "stable" version available. Why?

From my perspective, this, quite simply, is just not like it has been for all the time I've used Gentoo and Claws-Mail. Tell me please, what has changed? Can it be remedied?
Comment 11 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-04 18:29:11 UTC
Stay calm, breath in deeply.

Before you are so noisy please make yourself comfortable with the procedures within Gentoo.  3.7.4 has been added to Portage on 08 January 2010.  3.7.3 has not been stabilised because ~amd64 has been added to some plugins fast enough by the responsible party, I explained that already.  Gentoo policy wants 30 bug-free days in ~arch before a stabilisation can be requested, which is not over yet.  Currently I am not at home, so not much I can do about 3.7.5 at the moment.  If you want to get a package added or stabilised you could file a bug instead of writing lengthy complaints on a bug like this.  I am not monitoring Claws mail page every day.

Regards

Christian (quite annoyed)