@base-system: CC alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 m68k ~mips ppc ppc64 s390 sh sparc x86 if you agree.
Or would you go for .9 instead?
no real point in stabilizing an outdated version
As said on the depending/blocking bugs, these needs to be _tested well_ and they all need to go together.
Both stable on alpha.
On ppc64 64UL in chroot, I get the following failure: f_illitable_flexbg: illegal inode table with FLEX_BG: failed more detail as follows: @ -9,6 +9,8 @@ Group descriptor 1 checksum is invalid. FIXED. Group descriptor 2 checksum is invalid. FIXED. Group descriptor 3 checksum is invalid. FIXED. +Backing up journal inode block information. + Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Relocating group 1's inode table to 142... Restarting e2fsck from the beginning...
Created attachment 206079 [details] build.log (FEATURES="test") 4 failing tests.
Manual ./configure; make; make check and all tests pass.
(In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=206079) [details] > build.log (FEATURES="test") > > 4 failing tests. > CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS=m CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y # CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP is not set CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y # CONFIG_EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED is not set CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y lsmod: ext2 70664 0 Found some old bugs reports from Gentoo that suggested missing /etc/mtab, or missing DEBUG_FS in kernel, that's not the case here. dmesg: [ 4744.875458] debugfs[19340]: segfault at ffffffffffffffff ip ffffffffffffffff sp 00007fff36e3b888 error 4 and more...
Stable for HPPA.
ppc64 done
x86 stable
arm stable
ia64/sparc stable(In reply to comment #5) > On ppc64 64UL in chroot, I get the following failure: > > f_illitable_flexbg: illegal inode table with FLEX_BG: failed > > more detail as follows: > > @ -9,6 +9,8 @@ > Group descriptor 1 checksum is invalid. FIXED. > Group descriptor 2 checksum is invalid. FIXED. > Group descriptor 3 checksum is invalid. FIXED. > +Backing up journal inode block information. > + > Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes > Relocating group 1's inode table to 142... > Restarting e2fsck from the beginning... > Could be due to big endian...as i only get that failure on sparc. anyway, ia64/sparc stable, as the test doesn't fail, it just outputs some more stuff
Marked ppc stable.
e2fsprogs-1.41.9 is currently stable on amd64, but e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9 is not. IMHO this should not happen.
(In reply to comment #15) > e2fsprogs-1.41.9 is currently stable on amd64, but e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9 is > not. IMHO this should not happen. > Lies. It not marked stable yet.
Not sure if it's useful, but I have confirmed on 2 ~amd64 systems that the tests do not pass; one is using a 2.6.31 kernel, and the other 2.6.32.
(In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > e2fsprogs-1.41.9 is currently stable on amd64, but e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9 is > > not. IMHO this should not happen. > > > > Lies. It not marked stable yet. > I get the following block when trying to update on stable: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "~sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9 (masked by: ~amd64 keyword) (dependency required by "sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.41.9" [ebuild])
*** Bug 295691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
amd64 stable (can't reproduce the test failure anymore, never figured out what that was all about)
All done
