As of yesterday we have conky 1.7.1 out. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
*** Bug 273266 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 194037 [details] improved ebuild with imlib and lua support Two new use flags to allow 1.7.1 to compile with these new features. About imlib you can read here: http://conky.wikia.com/wiki/Conky_and_Images_%28IMLIB2%29
Please also apply this patch from https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264240 especially the renaming of the ibm useflag to thinkpad.
Created attachment 194185 [details, diff] conky-1.7.1.1.ebuild.diff Patch for conky-1.7.0_rc1.ebuild -> conky-1.7.1.1.ebuild
Created attachment 194187 [details, diff] conky-1.7.1.1.ebuild.diff Wait, that last patch was a load of fail. Here's an even better one.
Works fine. Thank you!
What about adding a use dependency from eapi 2 like this: openmp? ( >=sys-devel/gcc-4.3[openmp] ) In this case the whole openmp, gcc built-with-use check is not needed anymore.
Created attachment 194929 [details, diff] conky-1.7.1.1.diff Attached ebuild uses an eapi 2 use dep for the openmp flag. Configure also throws a warning about --enable-proc-uptime so I removed it. It has been removed from configure a long time ago. Don't know why it was still there.
Created attachment 194932 [details, diff] conky-1.7.1.1.diff Changed useflag imlib2 to imlib which is a global useflag that is used in the tree for both imlib and imlib2.
Created attachment 194934 [details, diff] metadata.diff Updated metadata.
Created attachment 194936 [details, diff] conky-1.7.1.1.diff Grmpf. The configure flag is still imlib2.
@Daniel Pielmeier many thanks for the ebuild. but when it will go to portage?
(In reply to comment #12) > @Daniel Pielmeier > > many thanks for the ebuild. but when it will go to portage? > Someone needs to become the new maintainer for this package, as omp is no longer active.
(In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > @Daniel Pielmeier > > > > many thanks for the ebuild. but when it will go to portage? > > > > Someone needs to become the new maintainer for this package, as omp is no > longer active. > should i?! ;-)
I will take care of conky, but there are some issues that I need to work out before.
(In reply to comment #15) > I will take care of conky, but there are some issues that I need to work out > before. > Could you tell us then new version of conky will get into portage?
Created attachment 197476 [details] metadata.diff
Created attachment 197478 [details, diff] conky-1.7.1.1.diff New ebuild diff. I will add the ebuild if bug #274847 is resolved.
Just committed the new version. ppc64 keywords removed due to bug #274847.
