First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 26090
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Alastair Tse (RETIRED) <liquidx@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Jason Rhinelander <gentoo@jagerman.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
multiple_pids_are_ok.patch allows multiple pids to be specified from the command line. patch James Harlow (RETIRED) 2003-09-06 03:34 0000 515 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 26090 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 26090 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-08-06 17:39 0000 
top does not work properly when given multiple PID's.  According to both the
POD
and behaviour of previous versions, it is supposed to allow you to select
individual processes by using the arguments:

top p 100 p 101 p 102 p 103

-or-

top p 100,101,102,103

but neither work - the only result is:

        top: conflicting process selection

Specifing a _single_ PID works, but multiple PIDs do not.

------- Comment #1 From James Harlow (RETIRED) 2003-09-06 03:34:09 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=17144) [edit]
allows multiple pids to be specified from the command line.

------- Comment #2 From Alastair Tse (RETIRED) 2003-09-06 05:31:25 0000 ------- 
thanks for the patch. seems fine to me. now in procps-3.1.11-r1
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug