First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 25149
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Philip Walls (RETIRED) <malverian@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Paper <c.merloni@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 25149 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 25149 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-07-23 17:34 0000 
the povray-2.50c ebuild check for presence of gcc 3.2 or later, but in fact it
dies if version is != 3.2
I successfully compiled it with gcc 3.3, so it should be safe to change the
check to "gcc version >= 3.2"

------- Comment #1 From Mr. Bones. 2003-07-23 18:14:35 0000 ------- 
Looks like the povray ebuild needs more help than just that.

It allows the use of icc, but still does gcc version checking.  Seems like
it should DEPEND on >=gcc-3.2 but only if not USEing icc.  I think that would
be better than the current gcc version checking in pkg_setup.

------- Comment #2 From Mr. Bones. 2003-09-26 16:12:40 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 29706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #3 From Nicolai Lissner 2003-10-08 05:55:34 0000 ------- 
pardon, you are discussing about this since july - there is a solution given
here and the ebuild haven't changed yet? well, at least version 3.5 still
contains that bug (although Markus <gentoo@jokey.tv> re-reported it more
than 2 weeks ago. Only a few lines to change - why does nobody do this?

------- Comment #4 From Luca Barbato 2003-10-08 09:10:23 0000 ------- 
Fixed, hopefully.

Sorry but since was a low priority task probably nobody had the time.
Remeber that developers do not get paid and do what they do in their free
time.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug