Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 25149
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Philip Walls (RETIRED) <malverian@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Paper <c.merloni@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 25149 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 25149 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-07-23 17:34 0000 
the povray-2.50c ebuild check for presence of gcc 3.2 or later, but in fact it
dies if version is != 3.2
I successfully compiled it with gcc 3.3, so it should be safe to change the
check to "gcc version >= 3.2"

------- Comment #1 From Mr. Bones. 2003-07-23 18:14:35 0000 ------- 
Looks like the povray ebuild needs more help than just that.

It allows the use of icc, but still does gcc version checking.  Seems like
it should DEPEND on >=gcc-3.2 but only if not USEing icc.  I think that would
be better than the current gcc version checking in pkg_setup.

------- Comment #2 From Mr. Bones. 2003-09-26 16:12:40 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 29706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #3 From Nicolai Lissner 2003-10-08 05:55:34 0000 ------- 
pardon, you are discussing about this since july - there is a solution given
here and the ebuild haven't changed yet? well, at least version 3.5 still
contains that bug (although Markus <gentoo@jokey.tv> re-reported it more
than 2 weeks ago. Only a few lines to change - why does nobody do this?

------- Comment #4 From Luca Barbato 2003-10-08 09:10:23 0000 ------- 
Fixed, hopefully.

Sorry but since was a low priority task probably nobody had the time.
Remeber that developers do not get paid and do what they do in their free
time.
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug