version bump with new sexy flag Reproducible: Always
Created attachment 175596 [details] version bump I've modified ebuild from 0.11.4 version, so It's probably not good quality, but works for me.
Created attachment 175625 [details] some cosmetic changes
Created attachment 175897 [details] diff between gajim-0.11.4 and gajim-0.12
bugfix release 0.12.1 out
please add dev-python/pycrypto dependency for ESession (chat enryption)
Created attachment 176152 [details] new ebuild with pycrypto
Created attachment 176153 [details] diff
How is your opinion about making libsexy and crypto NOT optional? (I think the naming of the USE-Flags of these 2 are not very good. better e.g. esession) Besides that, libsexy/python-sexy is for clickable URL's in chat-messages - everybody wants that. And encrypted chat, too!? I mean, it's jabber/xmpp not icq, irc and Co.
jamatik, I agree, for average user adding new options via USE flag is not good idea. I thought that giving a choice is good thing, but not in this case.
Created attachment 176178 [details] ebuild wihout additional USE flags
Created attachment 176180 [details] diff between gajim-0.11.4 and gajim-0.12.1
wait for the new version
The new (diff) version tested and working fine. Please add to portage soon. BTW, I vote for more USE flags rather than more deps.
> The new (diff) version tested and working fine. Please add to portage soon. confirm, works great
Tested on amd64, works.
Tested on amd64, works fine. Please add to portage.
Vote on adding to portage
There has been 0.12.1 since 2008-12-12.
Hello, I use last attachment, but I have disabled E2E Encryption in chat window. My contact can initiate encrypted session and we can chat withour problems. But I can't disable encryption because of disabled option. PS. in features window, end to end is enabled.
I have this USE flags: X dbus idle libnotify nls spell trayicon -avahi -gnome -srv -xhtml Portage 2.2_rc14 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.2.4, glibc-2.6.1-r0, 2.6.28-gentoo x86_64) ================================================================= System uname: Linux-2.6.28-gentoo-x86_64-Pentium-R-_Dual-Core_CPU_E5200_@_2.50GHz-with-glibc2.2.5 Timestamp of tree: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:45:01 +0000 app-shells/bash: 3.2_p39 dev-lang/python: 2.5.2-r7 dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r6 dev-util/cmake: 2.6.2-r1 sys-apps/baselayout: 2.0.0 sys-apps/openrc: 0.4.2 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.18.1-r2 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.63 sys-devel/automake: 1.5, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10.2 sys-devel/binutils: 2.18-r3 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.4.0-r4 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.26 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.27-r2
Created attachment 181853 [details] EAPI=2 + fix bug #251466 * cleanup ebuild with EAPI=2 use dependencies * patches for autotools: fix installation of pyfiles in /usr/lib/python-2.5/site-packages/gajim not in /usr/share/gajim/src see uptsream: http://trac.gajim.org/ticket/4770
Created attachment 181854 [details, diff] fix autotools and datadir searches (in upstream)
Created attachment 181856 [details] move pyfiles out of /usr/share resolve bug #251466
(In reply to comment #23) > Created an attachment (id=181856) [edit] > move pyfiles out of /usr/share > > resolve bug #251466 > Default sound paths are broken now, because "../data/sounds" equivalent to "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/data/sounds". We need to patch config.py or do something else.
Created attachment 182185 [details, diff] quick fix for sounds searches Right, I didn't tried sounds ! add this dirty patch to your ebuild to test... You need to use a new profile: gajim -p myprofile to really test as paths are copied in your .gajim/config.<myprofile> at first start... otherwise, edit each path by add :-( ... hum this is bad, it should need a auto-migration workaround. Finally, I thinks that how gajim deals with datadirs need refactoring, 'cause there many variables which point to the data dir (see src/common/defs.py and src/common/gajimpaths.py) with some generated from autotools other can be overrided by envars (in trunk). So this will take time (if somebody have courage to do it, of course !)
Created attachment 185547 [details] error message i use your ebuild with all three patches. now i got this error.
Created attachment 185623 [details, diff] Backport from upstream The fix was already upstream: http://trac.gajim.org/changeset/10934 Here a backport patch to add to "epatch" list in ebuild. Thanks for testing !
no error till now, seems to work, thanks
Gajim 0.12.1 refuses to start if x11-libs/cairo was built without 'svg' USE-flag
when 0.12.1 ebuild will be in live portage? of course in first moment it should be mask ~ so people who want to run testing version will be happy, me too :-)
I have used gajim-0.12.x about three months (in Gentoo Linux and in Windows too) and it seems very stable... In Gentoo I need to install gajim from unofficial repository - it is very uncomfortably. So, when gajim will come into official Gentoo package tree?
(In reply to comment #31) > I have used gajim-0.12.x about three months (in Gentoo Linux and in Windows > too) and it seems very stable... In Gentoo I need to install gajim from > unofficial repository - it is very uncomfortably. > > So, when gajim will come into official Gentoo package tree? > As above - I want 0.12 in official portage tree
+1 Any reaction ? Does somebody look in here ? What's happening ? One of the most popular applications on Linux desktop doesn't have any ebuild for 4 month already! What's problem with it ?
> As above - I want 0.12 in official portage tree +1 I want it too. Maybe we have to email our request to developers?
(In reply to comment #34) > > As above - I want 0.12 in official portage tree > > +1 > I want it too. Maybe we have to email our request to developers? > He is always idle in #gentoo-dev-help on freenode
> He is always idle in #gentoo-dev-help on freenode Hmm, it seems that Peter Weller does not support Gajim (or Linux at all) or just retired... See his blog - http://blogs.gentoo.org/welp, the latest entry posted year ago. Anybody knows how to attract an attention of other Gentoo developers? Maybe net-im/gajim require a new maintainer...
*** Bug 267674 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
+*gajim-0.12.1 (27 Apr 2009) + + 27 Apr 2009; Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org> + +files/0.12.1-roster_window.py_r10934.patch, + +files/0.12.1-sound-path-fix.patch, + +files/0.12.1_autotools_install_pyfiles_in_pkglibdir.patch, + +files/fix_autotools_and_search_dirs.patch, +gajim-0.12.1.ebuild: + Bump to 0.12.1, fixes #251298. Patches by Bruno Tarquini, ebuild mods by + Bruno Tarquini and Marcin Rybarski. Not sure if it works as expected, so please report any failures so we can get it into a usable shape :)
Created attachment 193907 [details, diff] diff for net-im/gajim-0.12.2 Do you forget the gnome-keyring? I added this and 'crypt' Use-flags
Created attachment 193908 [details, diff] new autotools_install_pyfiles_in_pkglibdir.patch I cant find gajim-remote.in in gajim-0.12.2 tarball :(
