Bug 25003 – freedroidrpg-0.9.6.ebuild (New Version)

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Rob Cakebread (RETIRED) 2003-07-21 15:17:35 UTC]

New version available, 0.9.6.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

[Comment 1 Rob Cakebread (RETIRED) 2003-07-21 15:19:26 UTC]

Created attachment 14838 [details]
freedroidrpg-0.9.6.ebuild

This is just a slightly modified version of 0.9.4. I took out the
source_unpack() function because 'make distclean' didn't work on 0.9.6.
0.9.6 is running great.

[Comment 2 SpanKY 2003-07-21 15:35:57 UTC]

by 0.9.4 i assume you mean 0.9.5_p1 ... 
 
0.9.4 was never in the portage tree ;) 

[Comment 3 Rob Cakebread (RETIRED) 2003-07-21 17:47:09 UTC]

>by 0.9.4 i assume you mean 0.9.5_p1 ... 

Yeah, thats what I meant. When a user submits an ebuild like this, do you guys prefer patches rather than ebuilds?

Should I have selected 'games' as the 'Component'? Or just leave it as 'ebuild'?

The reason I ask is because the "Contributing Ebuilds" guide says "All ebuild scripts are of the component type Ebuilds", but I notice some of mine get changed to 'Games'.

[Comment 4 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) 2003-07-21 17:53:12 UTC]

I don't know about the rest of the games@g.o crew, but I prefer whole
ebuilds so I can just d/l them straight to my CVS tree and whack away at
them without having to patch a previous ebuild.

[Comment 5 SpanKY 2003-07-21 18:30:17 UTC]

all games are under games, otherwise ebuilds go under ebuilds ;) 

[Comment 6 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2003-07-22 06:01:29 UTC]

I prefer a full ebuild, also.  It does make it much easier to test without depending it on an older ebuild.

[Comment 7 SpanKY 2003-08-03 19:09:33 UTC]

added to cvs, thanks :)