First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 24626
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Alastair Tse (RETIRED) <liquidx@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Blu3 <david+gentoo.org@blue-labs.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 24626 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 24626 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-07-16 16:19 0000 
# emerge -u nss
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) dev-libs/nss-3.8 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) nss-3.8.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking nss-3.8.tar.gz to /mnt/old/var/tmp/portage/nss-3.8/work
>>> Source unpacked.
../coreconf/config.mk:67: ../coreconf/Linux2.6.mk: No such file or directory
../coreconf/config.mk:167: no file name for `-include'
make: *** No rule to make target ../coreconf/Linux2.6.mk.  Stop.
make: *** [../coreconf/Linux2.6.mk] Error 1

!!! ERROR: dev-libs/nss-3.8 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 43, Exitcode 2
!!! coreconf make failed

It occurs to me that an upstream patch of copying Linux2.5.mk to Linux2.6.mk
should be close to sufficient

------- Comment #1 From Pat Erley 2003-07-17 16:45:14 0000 ------- 
have tested and verified that copying the 2.5 file to 2.6 fixes it.  I believe
that a sumple patch has probably been submitted to mozilla for this, but is
sort of lost in the mixup of the whole domain move thing.

------- Comment #2 From Alastair Tse (RETIRED) 2003-07-20 09:22:50 0000 ------- 
thanks pat for the suggestion. i've fixed it by doing exactly that. however, i
don't have a 2.6 kernel to test. someone want to verify that it is truely fixed
for 2.6 ?

------- Comment #3 From Alastair Tse (RETIRED) 2003-08-29 10:22:34 0000 ------- 
i assume its fixed since a number of ppl use 2.6 and haven't reported the
problem since.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug