This is for GCC 4.3 stabilisation. Please add arches as you see fit. Thanks.
The next octave that should go stable is octave-3.*. However, since octave-3.* depends on a lot of new packages (mostly sparse-matrix support) that don't yet have stable versions this will probably take some time. Best, Markus
(In reply to comment #1) > The next octave that should go stable is octave-3.*. However, > since octave-3.* depends on a lot of new packages (mostly > sparse-matrix support) that don't yet have stable versions this > will probably take some time. > > Best, > Markus > status? whats the list of packages?
well, the list on amd64 is simply octave-3.0.3 and: sci-mathematics/glpk-4.29 Other arches, YMMV. please stable all that is needed for gcc-4.3 effort Keywords: alpha amd64 ppc x86 Keywords: ppc64 sparc
Stabilised those on alpha: media-libs/qhull-2003.1-r1 sci-libs/camd-2.2.0 sci-libs/ccolamd-2.7.1 sci-libs/ufconfig-3.1.0 sci-libs/colamd-2.7.1 sci-libs/metis-4.0.1-r1 sci-libs/amd-2.2.0 sci-libs/cholmod-1.6.0-r1 sci-libs/cxsparse-2.2.1 sci-libs/umfpack-5.2.0 sci-mathematics/glpk-4.35 sci-mathematics/octave-3.0.3 Skipped octave-forge since it isn't keyworded on alpha at all.
I am getting segfaults with test suite.
sci-libs/amd-2.2.0 test suite fails on x86, see bug #261568.
Created attachment 184858 [details] sci-libs:umfpack-5.2.0:20090307-152300.log umfpack fails some tests (nonfatal) here on amd64/x86, but x86 has much more output than amd64, here's the amd64 output: make[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/umfpack-5.2.0/work/UMFPACK/Demo' x [0] = 1 x [1] = 2 x [2] = 3 x [3] = 4 x [4] = 5 Test umfpack_simple PASSED. --- Testing umfpack_di_demo --- 1523c1523 < Total time: 0.00 seconds (CPU time), 0.00 seconds (wallclock time) --- > Total time: 0.01 seconds (CPU time), 0.00 seconds (wallclock time) Test `umfpack_di_demo' FAILED!!! --- Testing umfpack_dl_demo --- 1523c1523 < Total time: 0.00 seconds (CPU time), 0.00 seconds (wallclock time) --- > Total time: 0.01 seconds (CPU time), 0.01 seconds (wallclock time) Test `umfpack_dl_demo' FAILED!!! --- Testing umfpack_zi_demo --- 1523c1523 < Total time: 0.00 seconds (CPU time), 0.00 seconds (wallclock time) --- > Total time: 0.00 seconds (CPU time), 0.01 seconds (wallclock time) Test `umfpack_zi_demo' FAILED!!! --- Testing umfpack_zl_demo --- 1523c1523 < Total time: 0.00 seconds (CPU time), 0.01 seconds (wallclock time) --- > Total time: 0.00 seconds (CPU time), 0.00 seconds (wallclock time) Test `umfpack_zl_demo' FAILED!!! *** ERROR: 4/5 tests failed!!! Please check the failures before reporting make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/umfpack-5.2.0/work/UMFPACK/Demo' make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/umfpack-5.2.0/work/UMFPACK/Demo' make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/umfpack-5.2.0/work/UMFPACK' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/umfpack-5.2.0/work/UMFPACK' x86 is attached.
AMD64: Here everything compiles fine. Also my old matlab code seems to work fine and produces sane output. Portage 2.1.6.7 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/no-multilib, gcc-4.1.2, glibc-2.8_p20080602-r1, 2.6.25-gentoo-r7 x86_64) ================================================================= System uname: Linux-2.6.25-gentoo-r7-x86_64-AMD_Turion-tm-_64_Mobile_Technology_MT-28-with-glibc2.2.5 Timestamp of tree: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:45:02 +0000 app-shells/bash: 3.2_p39 dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7-r1, 2.1.7 dev-lang/python: 2.4.4-r13, 2.5.2-r7 dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r6 dev-util/cmake: 2.6.2-r1 sys-apps/baselayout: 1.12.11.1 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.18.1-r2 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.63 sys-devel/automake: 1.5, 1.7.9-r1, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10.2 sys-devel/binutils: 2.18-r3 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.4.0-r4 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.26 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.27-r2 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-march=k8 -msse3 -O2 -pipe" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/config" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/eselect/postgresql /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/php/apache2-php5/ext-active/ /etc/php/cgi-php5/ext-active/ /etc/php/cli-php5/ext-active/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/language.dat.d /etc/texmf/language.def.d /etc/texmf/updmap.d /etc/texmf/web2c /etc/udev/rules.d" CXXFLAGS="-march=k8 -msse3 -O2 -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="collision-protect distlocks fixpackages multilib-strict parallel-fetch protect-owned sandbox sfperms strict test unmerge-orphans userfetch userpriv" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.tiscali.nl/ ftp://gentoo.tiscali.nl/pub/mirror/gentoo/ http://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/os/linux/gentoo ftp://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/os/linux/gentoo" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1" LINGUAS="en nl" MAKEOPTS="-j2" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/" PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage/local/layman/ftd4linux /usr/overlay" SYNC="rsync://rsync.tiscali.nl/gentoo-portage" USE="X aac acpi admin alsa amd64 ao apache2 bash-completion bzip2 cairo calendar cli cracklib crypt cups curl cvs dbus dri escreen ffmpeg flac fontconfig fortran ftp gd gdbm gif hal highlight history hybrid-auth iconv isdnlog jpeg jpeg2k kde latex midi mmx mp3 mplayer mudflap mysql ncurses nls nptl nptlonly nsplugin ogg opengl openmp oss par pcre perl png posix pppd python qt3 qt3support readline reflection session spl sse sse2 ssl subversion sysfs tcpd threads tiff truetype unicode unrar unzip vim-syntax vorbis webdav-neon xine xml xmlreader xmlrpc xmlwriter xorg xpm xv zip zlib" ALSA_CARDS="ali5451 als4000 atiixp atiixp-modem bt87x ca0106 cmipci emu10k1x ens1370 ens1371 es1938 es1968 fm801 hda-intel intel8x0intel8x0m maestro3 trident usb-audio via82xx via82xx-modem ymfpci" ALSA_PCM_PLUGINS="adpcm alaw asym copy dmix dshare dsnoop empty extplug file hooks iec958 ioplug ladspa lfloat linear meter mmap_emul mulaw multi null plug rate route share shm softvol" APACHE2_MODULES="actions alias auth_basic authn_alias authn_anon authn_dbm authn_default authn_file authz_dbm authz_default authz_groupfile authz_host authz_owner authz_user autoindex cache dav dav_fs dav_lock deflate dir disk_cache env expires ext_filter file_cache filter headers include info log_config logio mem_cache mime mime_magic negotiation rewrite setenvif speling status unique_id userdir usertrack vhost_alias" ELIBC="glibc" INPUT_DEVICES="keyboard mouseevdev" KERNEL="linux" LCD_DEVICES="bayrad cfontz cfontz633 glk hd44780 lb216 lcdm001 mtxorb ncurses text" LINGUAS="en nl" USERLAND="GNU" VIDEO_CARDS="sis" Unset: CPPFLAGS, CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, FFLAGS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, LC_ALL, PORTAGE_COMPRESS, PORTAGE_COMPRESS_FLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS
looks good for me too on amd64. amd64 stable on both in summary (and deps).
Does it matter that octave-3.0.3 and octave-forge-2006.03.17-r1 cannot both be installed? Apparently, octave-3.0.3 supplies octave-forge.
Sparc is done, I think. We do not see any test failures with umfpack. Our comments are pretty much the same as Comment 4 above except we already have qhull. I also skipped octave-forge because if you have this version of octave, you can't install it, and since now octave-3.0.3 is stable and you use it, portage will give you grief when it tries to upgrade octave.
(In reply to comment #11) > Sparc is done, I think. We do not see any test failures with umfpack. Our > comments are pretty much the same as Comment 4 above except we already have > qhull. I also skipped octave-forge because if you have this version of octave, > you can't install it, and since now octave-3.0.3 is stable and you use it, > portage will give you grief when it tries to upgrade octave. > I assumed that the user would pick one or the other. As I am not familar with this package, I decided to stab both on amd64. Please let me know if I am wrong here.
(In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Sparc is done, I think. We do not see any test failures with umfpack. Our > > comments are pretty much the same as Comment 4 above except we already have > > qhull. I also skipped octave-forge because if you have this version of octave, > > you can't install it, and since now octave-3.0.3 is stable and you use it, > > portage will give you grief when it tries to upgrade octave. > > > > I assumed that the user would pick one or the other. As I am not familar with > this package, I decided to stab both on amd64. Please let me know if I am wrong > here. > Beats me. I'm not familiar with it either. I'll probably follow your lead for sparc.
Also octave-forge-2006.03.17-r1 stable on sparc, following Jeremy's reasoning in Comment 12. Note, however, if this is installed, you will not be able to upgrade to octave-3.0.3. And if octave-3.0.3 is installed, you will not be able to install any version of octave-forge at all because of the RDEPEND: !sci-mathematics/octave-forge But it is set up so that you could run with this version of octave-forge but no octave.
Cannot build on amd64 with enabled USE-option "sparse" See bug#262892
x86 stable
ppc stable
Despite the huge QA problems that seemingly never got fixed, stable for HPPA.
superseeded by bug 318649.
