Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 24364
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Martin Holzer (RETIRED) <mholzer@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Stuart W. Finlayson <stu@santa-li.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 24364 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 24364 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2003-07-12 17:26 0000
Here's the command and output: 
 
wolverine root # emerge --deep --update --pretend fwbuilder 
 
These are the packages that I would merge, in order: 
 
Calculating dependencies - 
emerge: there are no masked or unmasked ebuilds to satisfy 
"=x11-libs/gtkmm-1.2*". 
 
!!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct. 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge --deep --update --pretend fwbuilder 
2.  
3. 
Actual Results:  
Dies with dependancy error. 

Expected Results:  
Lists the packages to upgrade, and upgardes when the --pretend flag is removed.

------- Comment #1 From Alex Buell 2003-07-13 01:58:51 0000 -------
This happens because the dependencies for gtkmm were not updated in the portage
tree when gtkmm was moved from x11-libs to dev-cpp! Please update the
dependencies urgently. 

------- Comment #2 From Martin Holzer (RETIRED) 2003-07-13 04:35:56 0000 -------
in cvs

------- Comment #3 From foser (RETIRED) 2003-07-13 04:55:53 0000 -------
hmm isn't the whole move thing supposed to catch this so not every dep has to
be updated at once ?

------- Comment #4 From Martin Holzer (RETIRED) 2003-07-13 05:19:18 0000 -------
no it doesn't

but it's a good catch
open a bug, maybe portage can do this in the next release

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug