Bugzilla Bug 243200

Added --with-boost=${EPREFIX}/usr to the econf call. Else boost is not found.
At least on Solaris #include<strings.> in lib/ljpegdecompressor.cpp is needed
to find bcopy.

Created an attachment (id=169400) [details]
ebuild

Created an attachment (id=169402) [details]
adds #include<strings.h> to ljpegdecompressor.cpp

added to the tree, thanks!

(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=169402) [edit] [details]
> adds #include<strings.h> to ljpegdecompressor.cpp
> 

Hi freedesktop team,
Would you consider this patch for the gentoo-x86 tree? I have tested it on
amd64-linux and it does not cause any problems (and it is needed for
x86-solaris). One of the Gentoo Prefix goals is to have as little as possible
changes compared to the gentoo-x86 tree. Thanks for your time. (Of course, if
you are *strongly* against this patch, that is fine as well. But it is a pretty
trivial patch)

Hum, you should probably use <cstring> instead of <strings.h>

Could you also report the bug upstream and send them your patch?

Thanks

(In reply to comment #5)
> Hum, you should probably use <cstring> instead of <strings.h>

Yea, that was already pointed out, slipped my mind.. ;)

> Could you also report the bug upstream and send them your patch?

bugs.fd.o seems down and I won't be able to work on Gentoo stuff until next
week (busy weekend), I won't be offended if someone else gets to it =D

Created an attachment (id=170006) [details]
updated patch to use cstring instead of strings.h

Upstream report: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18243

(In reply to comment #8)
> Upstream report: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18243
> 

Upstream has applied this to the git master branch. Could it be applied to
gentoo-x86 now? TIA.

Committed without a revbump.

@Daniel, epatch goes into src_unpack, not src_compile. Just letting you know :)

Thanks to the both of you.