Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 233683
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Markus Ullmann <jokey@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Michele Alzetta <michele@alzetta.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
2.6.27.patch 2.6.27.patch text/plain Tim Harder 2008-08-08 03:34 0000 766 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 233683 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 233683 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2008-08-02 08:35 0000
Virtualbox-bin-1.6.2 has fetch restriction, but the required file is no longer
available for download as version 1.6.4 has been released. An ebuild for 1.6.4
- which is the file one can download now - is necessary.

Reproducible: Always

------- Comment #1 From devsk 2008-08-02 08:49:26 0000 -------
where does the package vbox-kernel-module-src come from? does anyone know? It
seems to be required for virtualbox-modules but 1.6.4 version is not there
anywhere.

------- Comment #2 From Alessio Cassibba (X-Drum) 2008-08-04 21:50:01 0000 -------
Hi all,

(In reply to comment #0)
> Virtualbox-bin-1.6.2 has fetch restriction, but the required file is no longer
> available for download as version 1.6.4 has been released. An ebuild for 1.6.4
> - which is the file one can download now - is necessary.

Since the Sun acquisition of Innotek/VirtualBox there are some bit problems
with downloads, a VirtualBox told me that they are working on this issue, 
so in a near future they will be able to offer the PUEL edition of VirtualBox
on their website[1] without restrictions (aka without fetch-restrictions for
the gentoo users).

Atm they are not able to offer/control this files stored on the Sun Download
Center (SDLC).

(In reply to comment #1)
> where does the package vbox-kernel-module-src come from? does anyone know? It
> seems to be required for virtualbox-modules but 1.6.4 version is not there
> anywhere.

I don't know the reason but in the last two releases this file vanished (its no
more released as separate package), so i decided to do a tarball for this
package an to host it on gentoo mirrors, the package is released under the GPL
version 2 in addition i asked permission to do so, atm you can find it on my
own webspace[2]

A version bump is now available on jokey's overlay[3] for testing, please give
it a try.

[1] http://www.virtualbox.org/download/
[2] http://gentoo.zerodev.it/files/vbox-kernel-module-src-1.6.4.tar.bz2
[3] https://overlays.gentoo.org/dev/jokey/browser/trunk/app-emulation/

------- Comment #3 From devsk 2008-08-04 22:46:55 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi all,
> 
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Virtualbox-bin-1.6.2 has fetch restriction, but the required file is no longer
> > available for download as version 1.6.4 has been released. An ebuild for 1.6.4
> > - which is the file one can download now - is necessary.
> 
> Since the Sun acquisition of Innotek/VirtualBox there are some bit problems
> with downloads, a VirtualBox told me that they are working on this issue, 
> so in a near future they will be able to offer the PUEL edition of VirtualBox
> on their website[1] without restrictions (aka without fetch-restrictions for
> the gentoo users).
> 
> Atm they are not able to offer/control this files stored on the Sun Download
> Center (SDLC).
> 
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > where does the package vbox-kernel-module-src come from? does anyone know? It
> > seems to be required for virtualbox-modules but 1.6.4 version is not there
> > anywhere.
> 
> I don't know the reason but in the last two releases this file vanished (its no
> more released as separate package), so i decided to do a tarball for this
> package an to host it on gentoo mirrors, the package is released under the GPL
> version 2 in addition i asked permission to do so, atm you can find it on my
> own webspace[2]
> 
> A version bump is now available on jokey's overlay[3] for testing, please give
> it a try.
> 
> [1] http://www.virtualbox.org/download/
> [2] http://gentoo.zerodev.it/files/vbox-kernel-module-src-1.6.4.tar.bz2
> [3] https://overlays.gentoo.org/dev/jokey/browser/trunk/app-emulation/
> 

there is a nasty bug with 1.6.4 where an ever growing debug log is written to
user's home dir. any idea if there is a fix for it?

------- Comment #4 From Alessio Cassibba (X-Drum) 2008-08-05 17:44:07 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> there is a nasty bug with 1.6.4 where an ever growing debug log is written to
> user's home dir. any idea if there is a fix for it?

Yes it was a glitch discovered only after the release,
you can simply disable logging via an environment variable to fix this
issue[1]:

export VBOX_LOG_DEST=nofile

a note was added on virtualbox's site[2]

[1] http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?t=8358#30807
[2] http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads

------- Comment #5 From Alessio Cassibba (X-Drum) 2008-08-05 18:14:51 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
In order to simplify users' life, i added an env.d to export the 
environment variable:
VBOX_LOG_DEST=nofile

This assures that in this release logging will be disabled by default,
updated ebuilds (for virtualbox and virtualbox-bin) are on jokey's overlay[1].

[1] https://overlays.gentoo.org/dev/jokey/browser/trunk/app-emulation/

------- Comment #6 From devsk 2008-08-05 19:32:41 0000 -------
what's stopping it from going into portage tree? even as masked package?

------- Comment #7 From Alessio Cassibba (X-Drum) 2008-08-05 20:55:59 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> what's stopping it from going into portage tree? even as masked package?
> 

nothing technically, it's only a matter of time, i don't have access to the
portage tree (because i'm not a dev), this task will be accomplished by someone
else (eg:jokey) please hang on :D

------- Comment #8 From SpanKY 2008-08-06 09:29:38 0000 -------
since people need to download the .run anyways, splitting off the modules
doesnt really gain much except create a weird black box without documentation
as to how this magic tarball was made.  please convert
virtualbox-modules-1.6.4.ebuild to simply use the same .run file as
virtualbox-bin-1.6.4.  it's simple once you set S to ${WORKDIR}/src and have it
use the same unpacking method.

since you already need to agree to the license when downloading the file,
there's no need to check_license in the ebuild.  please apply these changes to
the virtualbox-bin-1.6.4 ebuild:
-DESCRIPTION="Softwarefamily of powerful x86 virtualization"
+DESCRIPTION="family of powerful x86 virtualization products for enterprise as
well as home use"
-       elog "Please from the site:"
+       elog "Please download the package from the site:"
-       check_license

------- Comment #9 From Tim Harder 2008-08-08 03:34:57 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=162484) [details]
2.6.27.patch

I needed this patch to compile the virtualbox module under 2.6.27-rc2.

------- Comment #10 From devsk 2008-08-09 03:59:34 0000 -------
any ETA on this reaching portage tree? masked or not.

------- Comment #11 From Markus Ullmann 2008-08-10 14:40:51 0000 -------
within the next 20 minutes ;)
InCVS now

------- Comment #12 From devsk 2008-08-10 17:22:52 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> within the next 20 minutes ;)
> InCVS now
> 

is the variable for turning debugging off set in the env.d? I don't see it set
in a new login.

------- Comment #13 From Alessio Cassibba (X-Drum) 2008-08-11 22:37:16 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> is the variable for turning debugging off set in the env.d? I don't see it set
> in a new login.
sorry i wasn't able to reply, after some test with env.d variable i found that
in some scenarios (eg: when VirtualBox is not launched via shell) it still
produce huge logs, so i setted the variable in the wrapper, the version
commited in portage uses this approach too.

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug