Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 232310
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo/BSD Team <bsd@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02.ebuild jdk 1.6 text/plain Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 12:26 0000 3.81 KB Details
diablo-jdk-1.6.env env for jdk 1.6 text/plain Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 12:27 0000 931 bytes Details
diablo-jre-bin-1.6.0.07.02.ebuild jre 1.6 text/plain Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 12:27 0000 2.90 KB Details
diablo-jre-bin-1.6.env env for jre 1.6 text/plain Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 12:28 0000 861 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 232310 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 232310 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2008-07-19 09:43 0000
According to:
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml

We can have the 1.6 jdk.

First thing I can think of is that we'll need some tuning if we want to support
fbsd 6 and 7; also help from the java team would be greatly appreciated so that
it can integrate nicely with all the work they've done.


This is just a reminder, no work has started on that side yet afaik.

------- Comment #1 From Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 11:53:45 0000 -------
I think I have ebuilds that seem to work.
They are fbsd7 specific though, we'll probably need a way to guess which
tarball to use depending on if we're on fbsd7 or 6. Or just never support 1.6
for fbsd6 (which will probably be the simplest way).

Anyway, I'd like to have reviews from the java team; and I'm not sure how to
proceed:
a) put them in the tree without keyword (will help integrating fbsd7 faster)
b) put them in the bsd overlay
c) attach them here

------- Comment #2 From Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 12:26:57 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=160826) [details]
jdk 1.6

------- Comment #3 From Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 12:27:14 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=160828) [details]
env for jdk 1.6

------- Comment #4 From Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 12:27:41 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=160830) [details]
jre 1.6

------- Comment #5 From Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 12:28:01 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=160832) [details]
env for jre 1.6

------- Comment #6 From Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 12:28:30 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #1)

> c) attach them here


here they are, probably simpler that way for now

------- Comment #7 From Alexis Ballier 2008-07-19 17:02:49 0000 -------
one thing isn't clear to me: we wont have 1.5 jdk on fbsd 7 so we need to mask
it, does that mean we have to mask java5 useflag too ?

------- Comment #8 From Petteri Räty 2008-10-08 19:02:19 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> one thing isn't clear to me: we wont have 1.5 jdk on fbsd 7 so we need to mask
> it, does that mean we have to mask java5 useflag too ?
> 

java5 means >=1.5 so no masking

------- Comment #9 From Petteri Räty 2008-10-08 19:04:19 0000 -------
The env files say Sun JDK and Sun JRE. This should be changed.

------- Comment #10 From Alexis Ballier 2008-10-15 13:37:41 0000 -------
added and masked on 6.2 profiles; i'll have to modify the virtual too i suppose
and mask them on 6.2 profiles


fixed also the env file for old 1.5 versions


thanks for the comments

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug