Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 232277 - net-mail/imapsync-1.(182|255): broken since dev-perl/Mail-IMAPClient-3.xx
Summary: net-mail/imapsync-1.(182|255): broken since dev-perl/Mail-IMAPClient-3.xx
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High major (vote)
Assignee: Net-Mail Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-07-18 23:30 UTC by Aurélien Requiem
Modified: 2008-07-19 09:54 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Aurélien Requiem 2008-07-18 23:30:12 UTC
Hi,

imapsync refuse to start and even display help with version of dev-perl/Mail-IMAPClient version 3.xx
Even the latest version 1.255 failed.


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install/upgrade Mail-IMAPClient to version 3
2. install imapsync
3. run imapsync 

Actual Results:  
stromboli ~# imapsync 
Subroutine Authuser redefined at /usr/bin/imapsync line 2564.
imapsync needs perl lib Mail::IMAPClient release 2.2.9 exactly, future imapsync release may suppoort 3.0.x, but sorry not now. See file BUG_IMAPClient_3.xx
# Looks like your test died before it could output anything.

Expected Results:  
help should be displayed
Comment 1 Joe Peterson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-18 23:37:01 UTC
Note that a revbump of the imapsync-1.255 ebuild changing one line will fix this:

24c24
<       >=dev-perl/Mail-IMAPClient-2.1.4"
---
>       =dev-perl/Mail-IMAPClient-2.2.9"
Comment 2 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-18 23:44:01 UTC
Raúl: Why did you mark the Mail-IMAPClient version stable? There's no stabilization bug, I don't see that we had a second pair of eyes looking, if stabilization is fine.
Comment 3 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-18 23:45:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Note that a revbump of the imapsync-1.255 ebuild changing one line will fix
> this:

No, it doesn't. It's stable tree breakage.
Comment 4 Joe Peterson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-18 23:47:49 UTC
Even if the newer Mail-IMAPClient were *not* marked stable, this would break those who use the unstable Mail-IMAPClient.  imapsync *mandates* a specific version, so the ebuild needs to specify that version exactly.
Comment 5 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-19 09:33:12 UTC
Reverted to ~arch.
Comment 6 Tobias Scherbaum (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-19 09:39:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Note that a revbump of the imapsync-1.255 ebuild changing one line will fix
> > this:
> 
> No, it doesn't. It's stable tree breakage.
> 

revbumped to -r1 with a fixed dep on "=dev-perl/Mail-IMAPClient-2.2.9".

As for the stable b0rkage we would need x86 to mark imapsync-1.255-r1 stable, cc'ing x86 therefore. 1.255 has been in portage for less than the usual month, do what you think is appropriate here. Thanks!
Comment 7 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-19 09:48:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > Note that a revbump of the imapsync-1.255 ebuild changing one line will fix
> > > this:
> > 
> > No, it doesn't. It's stable tree breakage.
> > 
> 
> revbumped to -r1 with a fixed dep on "=dev-perl/Mail-IMAPClient-2.2.9".
> 
> As for the stable b0rkage we would need x86 to mark imapsync-1.255-r1 stable,
> cc'ing x86 therefore. 1.255 has been in portage for less than the usual month,
> do what you think is appropriate here. Thanks!
> 

Its not stable anymore :P No need to do anything here for x86
Comment 8 Tobias Scherbaum (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-19 09:52:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> Its not stable anymore :P No need to do anything here for x86

Any objections to close this one then? 

Comment 9 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-19 09:54:22 UTC
Nope