First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 230822
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Ruby Team <ruby@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 230822 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 230822 blocks: 230339
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-07-05 06:17 0000 
This version has been in the tree for over a month with no open bug reports. It
contains only a few bug fixes compared to currently stable 1.15.12, but one of
those is crucial since that allows rmagick 1.15.14 to compile against the
recently stabled imagemagick 6.4.0.x.

------- Comment #1 From Brent Baude 2008-07-05 13:45:55 0000 ------- 
ppc stable

------- Comment #2 From Brent Baude 2008-07-05 13:47:22 0000 ------- 
ppc64 stable

------- Comment #3 From Thomas Anderson 2008-07-05 15:10:09 0000 ------- 
amd64 stable

------- Comment #4 From Markus Meier 2008-07-06 12:56:57 0000 ------- 
x86 stable

------- Comment #5 From Jeroen Roovers 2008-07-07 01:23:51 0000 ------- 
Stable for HPPA.

------- Comment #6 From Ferris McCormick 2008-07-07 12:49:30 0000 ------- 
Sparc stable.  It builds its own examples as expected.  I wonder why we have
both rmagic-1.xx and rmagic-2.xx in the same slot.

------- Comment #7 From Raúl Porcel 2008-07-07 13:07:30 0000 ------- 
alpha/ia64 stable,closing

------- Comment #8 From Hans de Graaff 2008-07-07 17:56:05 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #6)
> I wonder why we have
> both rmagic-1.xx and rmagic-2.xx in the same slot.
> 

They are not meant to be installed together, and 2.xx is a drop-in replacement
for the 1.xx series modulo some ImageMagick changes. 2.xx is however a new
codebase, so that's why both versions are still in the tree. All future
development takes place on the 2.xx tree.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug