First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 22872
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Roberto Rivera <rooby@ziplip.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
openoffice-bin-1.1_beta2.tar.bz2 openoffice-bin-1.1_beta2.ebuild application/x-tbz Roberto Rivera 2003-06-15 10:18 0000 5.76 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 22872 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 22872 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-06-15 10:05 0000 
The bin ebuild for Openoffice 1.1beta2

------- Comment #1 From Roberto Rivera 2003-06-15 10:18:01 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=13314) [edit]
openoffice-bin-1.1_beta2.ebuild

Since there is no OpenOffice maintainer, I've updated the
openoffice-bin-1.1_beta1.ebuild for beta 2.  There were quite a few changes
required for the kde mimetypes and such.  It has been working fine on my system
(x86), I have not tested the PowerPC install.  Although the gnome specific
parts look good, since I don't use it, I can't confirm that the ebuild will
install the gnome mimetypes stuff correctly.

Caveat:  when running from the command prompt the .sversionrc file in the home
directory is created with one entry for OpenOffice.org 1.1=...	I had to
manually add another entry for OpenOffice.org 1.1beta=... with the same
settings.  Otherwise you might get the following error:
openoffice.org:  You have no entry for OpenOffice.org 1.1beta in ~/.sversionrc,
...

Hope this helps.
rooby

------- Comment #2 From Paul de Vrieze 2003-06-19 01:45:01 0000 ------- 
I will look into the binary for beta2 soon.

------- Comment #3 From Paul de Vrieze 2003-06-19 13:52:32 0000 ------- 
I've just committed a new ebuild that uses the fixes I made in the source
ebuild. Please test it, it should work
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug