Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 225045 - dev-libs/boost-1.35.0 mpi-dependency keywording or mask request
Summary: dev-libs/boost-1.35.0 mpi-dependency keywording or mask request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Tiziano Müller (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 216120
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-06-05 20:40 UTC by Tiziano Müller (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-03-03 13:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tiziano Müller (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-05 20:40:13 UTC
Dear arch-teams

The new boost version contains C++ bindings for MPI.
It therefore needs either openmpi or mpich2.

You have two options:
i) Mask the mpi USE-flag for boost
ii) Keyword one of dependencies above

HPPA: Please re-add your keyword to boost-1.35.0 afterwards (had to drop it)

TIA
Comment 1 Tiziano Müller (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-06 06:01:41 UTC
Adding sh.
Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-16 04:50:51 UTC
Had to mask USE=mpi sadly. I hope to find some time to look into getting openmpi fixed.
Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-16 23:39:19 UTC
Marked ~hppa again.
Comment 4 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2008-08-08 20:41:13 UTC
Fails to build here; seems to be some c++ errors plus probably a "bug" in bsd headers: SIGPOLL isn't defined; according to http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/signal.h.html it's in XSI; there is a patch here http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=92362 may be we should just apply it for fbsd7 in order to be more standard and avoid possible future problems. Or better, define it to SIGIO like the linux-headers do. Javier, any thoughts about this ?
Comment 5 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2008-08-08 20:42:53 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Fails to build here; seems to be some c++ errors plus probably a "bug" in bsd
> headers: SIGPOLL isn't defined; according to
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/signal.h.html it's in
> XSI; there is a patch here http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=92362 may
> be we should just apply it for fbsd7 in order to be more standard and avoid
> possible future problems. Or better, define it to SIGIO like the linux-headers
> do. Javier, any thoughts about this ?

gmbl how comes I was sure bsd@ was in cc ?

Comment 6 Peter Volkov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-03-03 13:57:04 UTC
mips masked USE flag mpi. 
Comment 7 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-04-06 17:09:32 UTC
use.masked on arm/sh
Comment 8 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2009-12-10 22:10:43 UTC
bsd done
Comment 9 Dirkjan Ochtman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-03 13:11:56 UTC
Every arch done, closing.