Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 219882
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Benedikt Böhm <hollow@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Benedikt Böhm <hollow@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 219882 depends on: 220055 Show dependency tree
Bug 219882 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2008-04-30 21:22 0000
keywords were dropped from subversion-1.5.0_rc4

------- Comment #1 From George Shapovalov 2008-05-02 17:00:16 0000 -------
Please hold on on subversion. See bug #220055.

------- Comment #2 From Ferris McCormick 2008-05-02 19:01:58 0000 -------
I ran into some other curiosities when subversion-1.5* went briefly ~amd64 but
unmasked.  It seems that this requires a version bump to  net-misc/neon-0.28.2,
but if you do that, you also have to rebuild rpm-4.4* (library name change). 
But it also seems that rpm-4* does not build with neon-0.28.2 and that you
would need rpm-5*, except that that series is p.masked, ...

All of that said, ~sparc added to net-libs/serf-0.1.2  --- it does build and
install, and its tests work OK.

I am leaving sparc in the CC awaiting the subversion issues to get sorted out
and also the subversion/neon/rpm thing (it looks like several packages have to
be upgraded simultaneously, and I can file a separate bug if you need it, but I
really don't know how things actually have to happen.)  However, ~sparc is all
done for serf.

------- Comment #3 From Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2008-05-05 12:07:33 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> it also seems that rpm-4* does not build with neon-0.28.2

RPM isn't official package manager in Gentoo, so Subversion doesn't need to
wait for fixing RPM.

> it looks like several packages have to be upgraded simultaneously

And what's wrong with it? Do these packages fail to build?

------- Comment #4 From Ferris McCormick 2008-05-05 12:55:27 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > it also seems that rpm-4* does not build with neon-0.28.2
> 
> RPM isn't official package manager in Gentoo, so Subversion doesn't need to
> wait for fixing RPM.
> 
> > it looks like several packages have to be upgraded simultaneously
> 
> And what's wrong with it? Do these packages fail to build?

Yes. :)

RPM is a package in our tree, so it needs to build if it claims it does,
official package manager or not.  And something must require it (or have
required it at some point) --- I have no use for it otherwise.

No, rpm has nothing to do with subversion.  The problem appears to look like
this:
subversion-1.5* requires neon-0.28*;
subversion-1.5* was briefly unmasked;
Upgrading to neon-0.28* changes the version of libneon;
This forces a rebuild of rpm;
Which means rpm-4*;
But rpm-4* does not seem to build against neon-0.28* because of <.h> file
changes;
I suppose rpm-5* does build, but it is masked.

So, there are several packages here that interact because of the neon change. 
I put it here because the bug is about sumversion-1.5*, and it looks to me like
subversion-1.5* and rpm-5* need to get unmasked at the same time because of the
not-so-innocent 3rd party (neon-0.28*).

------- Comment #5 From Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2008-05-05 13:15:56 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> subversion-1.5* requires neon-0.28*;

I suggested this dependency to force availability of some new features.
Subversion can be built when Neon 0.26 is installed, but configure won't define
SVN_NEON_0_27 and SVN_NEON_0_28, so support for some features won't be built
(e.g. support for PaKChoiS).

------- Comment #6 From Markus Rothe 2008-05-11 16:24:11 0000 -------
added ~ppc64

------- Comment #7 From Raúl Porcel 2008-05-12 18:46:06 0000 -------
~alpha/~ia64 done

------- Comment #8 From Jeroen Roovers 2008-05-17 05:22:29 0000 -------
Both marked ~hppa.

------- Comment #9 From Ferris McCormick 2008-05-20 15:32:46 0000 -------
~sparc added to dev-util/subversion-1.5.0_rc5.  serf-0.1.2 was already ~sparc,
subversion builds and runs with USE='webdav-neon webdav-serf'.

------- Comment #10 From nixnut 2008-06-14 16:45:18 0000 -------
~ppc'd

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug