First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 219003
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Markus Duft <mduft@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Markus Duft <mduft@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
groff-x-deps.patch proposed patch for sys-apps/groff, which adds dependencies patch Markus Duft 2008-04-23 09:49 0000 620 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 219003 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 219003 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2008-04-23 09:48 0000
dependencies are not there. this was seen on gentoo-alt/prefix, where there are
no X libraries during bootstrap, but i believe this is a more general problem
:)

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge groff with USE=X on a system without libX* (or old, damaged or
otherwise unusable X libs)

------- Comment #1 From Markus Duft 2008-04-23 09:49:10 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=150686) [edit]
proposed patch for sys-apps/groff, which adds dependencies

------- Comment #2 From Markus Duft 2008-05-08 13:15:16 0000 -------
ping...?

------- Comment #3 From SpanKY 2008-06-01 02:44:39 0000 -------
the proposed list seems kind of excessive for something like groff ... if the X
team could take a look, that'd be great

------- Comment #4 From Markus Duft 2008-06-02 06:03:04 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> the proposed list seems kind of excessive for something like groff ... if the X
> team could take a look, that'd be great

what i did was putting all pakages in the dependencies, from which libraries
where present on the link line... of course it could be that some of them are
implicit through others anyway, but still they are linked directly (and
seemingly hardcoded, since there where none installed when i tried building,
and copied the link line.)

------- Comment #5 From Donnie Berkholz 2008-06-04 06:29:50 0000 -------
libXaw is the only one you need, the rest are implicitly pulled in by the dep
tree.

------- Comment #6 From SpanKY 2008-06-21 06:08:12 0000 -------
Markus: feel free to commit the proposed patch here

------- Comment #7 From Markus Duft 2008-06-23 07:12:53 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Markus: feel free to commit the proposed patch here

ok... i will commit the one-liner -> i.e. only the dep to Xaw instead of the
full list. is this ok?

------- Comment #8 From SpanKY 2008-06-23 07:22:24 0000 -------
i'd commit the patch posted here ... as you say, the package links against all
of those libs

------- Comment #9 From Markus Duft 2008-06-24 06:21:04 0000 -------
oh man... still having a hard time checking out a gentoo-x86 tree from cvs.
seems like the disks on the server are full :(

------- Comment #10 From Fabian Groffen 2008-06-24 09:11:46 0000 -------
Markus, you committed this, so please update this bug as well.  Also, it is
useful for future reference if you mention the bug number in the ChangeLog.

------- Comment #11 From Markus Duft 2008-06-24 11:03:42 0000 -------
err. forgot the bug number, yes :) i updated the changelog (and the manifest
after thinking about it....)

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug