First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 217845
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: NEW
Resolution:
Assigned To: Crypto team <crypto@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) <alonbl@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 217845 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 217845 blocks: 213352 227679
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)









View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-04-15 19:54 0000 
Hello,
Minor fixes.
Thanks!

------- Comment #1 From Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) 2008-04-15 19:56:40 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 206664 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #2 From Jeroen Roovers 2008-04-15 20:21:18 0000 ------- 
Similar to the gnupg-1.4.9 bug, it's too soon. We normally allow 30 days to
pass for bug( report)s to surface. Why are you rushing it now?

------- Comment #3 From Jeroen Roovers 2008-04-15 20:22:21 0000 ------- 
*pinentry-0.7.5 (23 Mar 2008)

------- Comment #4 From Jeroen Roovers 2008-04-15 20:35:45 0000 ------- 
CC hppa when due, please (~23 Apr 2007).

------- Comment #5 From Markus Rothe 2008-04-16 16:04:38 0000 ------- 
same for ppc64

------- Comment #6 From Peter Volkov 2008-04-16 16:32:40 0000 ------- 
Same for all archs, if disagree, argument in on going discussion on dev.

------- Comment #7 From Tobias Klausmann 2008-04-16 20:00:39 0000 ------- 
Stable on alpha.

------- Comment #8 From Mart Raudsepp 2008-04-16 21:17:03 0000 ------- 
Note that I intend to stabilize glib-2.16 soon. If this isn't stable by then,
it's simply going to break, so I wholeheartedly agree with the earlier
stabilization.

------- Comment #9 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2008-04-17 07:38:56 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #8)
> Note that I intend to stabilize glib-2.16 soon. If this isn't stable by then,
> it's simply going to break, so I wholeheartedly agree with the earlier
> stabilization.

Well we have tracker bugs and blockers to prevent such scenarios? Adding a
blocker.

------- Comment #10 From Raúl Porcel 2008-04-17 15:13:10 0000 ------- 
ia64/sparc/x86 stable

------- Comment #11 From nixnut 2008-04-17 16:52:52 0000 ------- 
ppc stable

------- Comment #12 From Richard Freeman 2008-05-03 12:20:35 0000 ------- 
amd64 stable

------- Comment #13 From Peter Volkov 2008-05-22 10:49:51 0000 ------- 
Updated in release snapshot as Chris wanted that:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217839#c7

------- Comment #14 From Jeroen Roovers 2008-06-18 16:10:06 0000 ------- 
Stable for HPPA.

------- Comment #15 From Serhij S. Stasyuk 2008-07-15 10:52:06 0000 ------- 
Any changes on this? It is one of the GNOME 2.22 blockers.

Unstable arches are: ~arm ~mips ~s390 ~sh ~x86-fbsd

Sorry, can't test them - no machines with those architectures.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug