Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 217725
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Java team <java@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
20080502-140246.log build.log text/plain Christian Faulhammer 2008-05-02 14:05 0000 29.76 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 217725 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 217725 blocks: 217448
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-04-14 21:02 0000 
Should have been marked when java-virtuals/javamail went stable

23:57 < Ken69267> weee!
23:57 < Ken69267> yay blockers!
23:57 < Ken69267>  <dev-java/gnu-javamail-1.0-r2 (is blocking
java-virtuals/javamail-1.0-r1)
23:57  * Ken69267 stabs java-mail
23:58  * Ken69267 shrugs and nukes both

------- Comment #1 From Petteri Räty 2008-04-14 22:18:16 0000 ------- 
0:27 < Ken69267> [ebuild  N    ] dev-java/gnu-javamail-1.0-r2  USE="doc" 0 kB
00:27 < Ken69267> [blocks B     ] <=dev-java/mx4j-3.0.1-r2 (is blocking
dev-java/gnu-javamail-1.0-r2)
00:28 < Ken69267> shouldn't that not block?
00:29 < Ken69267> oh, nvm
00:29 < Ken69267> Betelgeuse: guess we have another bug :D

This should have been done too.

------- Comment #2 From Christian Faulhammer 2008-05-02 09:12:15 0000 ------- 
x86 stable

------- Comment #3 From Christian Faulhammer 2008-05-02 14:05:33 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=151622) [details]
build.log

Fails with ibm-jdk-bin-1.6.0.1 (newer junit).

------- Comment #4 From Kenneth Prugh 2008-05-03 02:47:37 0000 ------- 
amd64 stable

------- Comment #5 From Petteri Räty 2008-05-23 20:03:51 0000 ------- 
Seems all done here.
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug