First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 217398
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 217398 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 217398 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-04-12 14:15 0000 
Hello arches,

dev-libs/libxml2-2.6.31 is a bug fix release (and a security fix one, but we
have that fix in .30-r1 already) that has been sitting in the tree, waiting for
some stabilization love, for 43 days. Please stabilize it. Mark the version
number, I might be adding a 2.6.32 bump to ~arch soon, that wouldn't be ready
immediately of course.

------- Comment #1 From nixnut 2008-04-12 14:40:21 0000 ------- 
ppc stable

------- Comment #2 From Jeroen Roovers 2008-04-12 17:20:00 0000 ------- 
Stable for HPPA.

------- Comment #3 From Raúl Porcel 2008-04-12 19:19:43 0000 ------- 
alpha/ia64/sparc/x86 stable

------- Comment #4 From Markus Rothe 2008-04-13 13:19:41 0000 ------- 
ppc64 stable

------- Comment #5 From Kenneth Prugh 2008-04-13 16:30:25 0000 ------- 
amd64 stable

------- Comment #6 From Gilles Dartiguelongue 2008-08-23 09:14:37 0000 ------- 
obsoleted by security bug #234099.

arm, m68k, s390, sh, see you there.

------- Comment #7 From Mart Raudsepp 2008-08-29 23:17:16 0000 ------- 
Actually bug 229709 superseeds this, not the security one. libxml2-2.6.32-r1
got p.masked due to breaking ABI and librsvg and strigi and whatnot. But indeed
there's a bug that requests a newer version stable, which is 2.6.32-r0

------- Comment #8 From Mart Raudsepp 2008-08-30 20:48:27 0000 ------- 
Whoops, the arches weren't meant to be readded to CC. I was first going to due
to 2.6.32-r1 not going stable, but later noticed 2.6.32 is already stabilized
for the rest but forgot to remove the arches from Add CC list.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug