First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 216527
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: The Soldering-Iron Brotherhood <sci-electronics@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Fabio Rossi <rossi.f@inwind.it>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
gwave-20080127.ebuild gwave-20080127.ebuild text/plain Fabio Rossi 2008-04-06 13:57 0000 1.01 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 216527 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 216527 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2008-04-06 13:56 0000
gwave was hard masked on 31 Mar 2008. Recently
(http://archives.seul.org/geda/dev/Feb-2008/msg00033.html) the gwave homepage
was moved to sourceforge: http://gwave.sourceforge.net/.

There are two versions of the program. In portage all release < 20070514 belong
to the trunk version (aka gwave1) while the 20070514 release represents a
snapshot of a new branch (aka gwave2). The 20070514 release was inserted in the
tree because of compilation issues with guile-1.8 (#195072).

Now the trunk version gwave-20080127 compiles with guile-1.8 and shouldn't
crash as the experimental gwave2 version.

------- Comment #1 From Fabio Rossi 2008-04-06 13:57:20 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=148866) [edit]
gwave-20080127.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Denis Dupeyron 2008-04-06 16:13:31 0000 -------
I've got even newer news than this. There was a more recent release sometime in
february (can't remember the exact date).

The reason I masked gwave is that I couldn't compile it reliably, no matter
what I tried. I had a look at your ebuild and the strict dependency to
x11-libs/guile-gtk-1.2.0.60 is interesting. I was under the impression that it
required >=guile-gtk-2.0. That may be the reason why I had so much trouble. The
funny thing is that I did succeed compiling it with >=guile-gtk-2.0 but can't
remember anymore how.

I'll definitely work on this as this is one of the big problems on my list, but
I have a few emergencies to work on first. And since I'm soon going to be on a
semi-hiatus for 3 weeks, it'll probably have to wait for me to come back. Once
this is fixed I can overhaul the meta ebuild for geda-suite.

Denis.

------- Comment #3 From Fabio Rossi 2008-04-06 22:15:31 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I've got even newer news than this. There was a more recent release sometime in
> february (can't remember the exact date).

Yes, the February release is related to the gwave2 branch which is unstable.

> The reason I masked gwave is that I couldn't compile it reliably, no matter
> what I tried. I had a look at your ebuild and the strict dependency to
> x11-libs/guile-gtk-1.2.0.60 is interesting. I was under the impression that it
> required >=guile-gtk-2.0. That may be the reason why I had so much trouble. The
> funny thing is that I did succeed compiling it with >=guile-gtk-2.0 but can't
> remember anymore how.

I haven't tried with guile-gtk-2.0 but on the web site it's specified that the
dependency on x11-libs/guile-gtk-1.2.0.60 is required when compiling against
guile-1.8.

> I'll definitely work on this as this is one of the big problems on my list, but
> I have a few emergencies to work on first. And since I'm soon going to be on a
> semi-hiatus for 3 weeks, it'll probably have to wait for me to come back. Once
> this is fixed I can overhaul the meta ebuild for geda-suite.

Ok, thanks for your work!

------- Comment #4 From Denis Dupeyron 2008-04-20 22:50:00 0000 -------
Fixed, thanks a lot.

Denis.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug