Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 215322
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: hmbr <helderribas@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
gvfs-gphoto2-failure.log log of gvfs with <gphoto2-2.4.0 compile failure text/plain Peter Henriksson 2008-03-29 16:06 0000 2.70 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 215322 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 215322 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-03-29 14:30 0000 
gvfs-0.2.1 with use gphoto2 only compiled in my system with 
media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.0-r1

Reproducible: Always

------- Comment #1 From Mart Raudsepp 2008-03-29 14:36:32 0000 ------- 
What does this mean? Please be more verbose

------- Comment #2 From Gilles Dartiguelongue 2008-03-29 14:58:40 0000 ------- 
and please don't skipping adding emerge --info to bugs reports, thanks.

------- Comment #3 From Peter Henriksson 2008-03-29 16:06:34 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=147636) [details]
log of gvfs with <gphoto2-2.4.0 compile failure

I can confirm that gnome-base/gvfs-0.2.1 and 0.2.2 needs
>=media-libs/gphoto2-2.4.0.
Log of failure attached.

------- Comment #4 From Waldo 2008-03-30 22:37:33 0000 ------- 
confirmed here too.  gvfs needs a dependency on libgphoto and gphoto2 > 2.4,
which incidentally were keyword masked ~amd64 on my machine.

W

------- Comment #5 From Gilles Dartiguelongue 2008-03-30 22:51:01 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #4)
> confirmed here too.  gvfs needs a dependency on libgphoto and gphoto2 > 2.4,
> which incidentally were keyword masked ~amd64 on my machine.

read on: do not mix STABLE packages with _HARD_MASKED_ packages.

------- Comment #6 From Waldo 2008-03-31 00:13:47 0000 ------- 
Hard masked or not, this was a missing dependency.  Should I not report such a
bug?

W

------- Comment #7 From Mart Raudsepp 2008-03-31 01:10:17 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #6)
> Hard masked or not, this was a missing dependency.  Should I not report such a
> bug?

Yes you should, thank you.

------- Comment #8 From Daniel Gryniewicz 2008-04-04 16:30:45 0000 ------- 
Dep fixed.
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug