First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 215293
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Ruby Team <ruby@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Richard Brown (RETIRED) <rbrown@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
rubygems-1.0.1-to-1.1.0.diff rubygems-1.0.1-to-1.1.0.diff patch Richard Brown (RETIRED) 2008-03-29 09:48 0000 1.49 KB Details | Diff
rubygems-1.1.0-setup.patch rubygems-1.1.0-setup.patch patch Richard Brown (RETIRED) 2008-03-29 09:49 0000 1.38 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 215293 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 215293 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-03-29 09:45 0000 
The ebuild can stay pretty much the same, but we need a new setup patch to sort
out --prefix properly. I've done this locally.

There is a problem, in that when I install rake with rubygems-1.1.0 I'm getting
an access violation with the gems installer trying to write to the gem cache
outside of $D, so I haven't added these into gentoo-x86 yet.

------- Comment #1 From Richard Brown (RETIRED) 2008-03-29 09:48:15 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=147612) [edit]
rubygems-1.0.1-to-1.1.0.diff

patch ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Richard Brown (RETIRED) 2008-03-29 09:49:16 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=147613) [edit]
rubygems-1.1.0-setup.patch

patch setup.rb to respect the prefix

------- Comment #3 From Richard Brown (RETIRED) 2008-03-29 10:20:48 0000 ------- 
remote_fetcher.rb line 91 in the download method is to blame for writing
outside the box, I'll try and look at fixing it later today.

------- Comment #4 From Richard Brown (RETIRED) 2008-03-29 15:20:52 0000 ------- 
ok, it's in cvs
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug