I have a machine with two radeon (rv370) cards, each of which is dual head. This setup works fine with the following versions: * x11-base/xorg-server-1.4.0.90-r3 * x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.6.3 * linux 2.6.24 (vanilla kernel) It does not work with linux 2.6.25-rc2 . I will attach the Xorg log file.
Created attachment 146753 [details] Xorg log file with linux 2.6.25-rc2 (fails)
Created attachment 146755 [details] Xorg log file with linux 2.6.24 (succeeds)
Could you test with the 6.8.0 driver? Please reopen when you reply.
Ok, I tested it with 6.8.0 (but please note that I have other issues with that driver version -- see #214136). New log files to follow.
Created attachment 146868 [details] xf86-video-ati-6.8.0 Xorg log file with linux 2.6.25-rc2 (fails)
Created attachment 146870 [details] xf86-video-ati-6.8.0 Xorg log file with linux 2.6.24 (succeeds)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15523
Just planning to stabilize 6.8 to fix this..
Following on from the bug on fdo, booting with kernel parameter pci=rom solves the problem. However the 6.8.0 driver still doesn't work for me (see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15524 ).
Well, for me, on r300 card * x11-base/xorg-server-1.4.0.90-r3 * x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.8.0 * gentoo-sources 2.6.25-r2 it seems to work without any tweaking, though those dri+composite issues are annoying.
Friendly reminder: we'll probably push for 2.6.25 stable in the next week or so, so it would be great to see this fixed
Arches, please stabilize x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.8.0-r1.
(In reply to comment #12) > Arches, please stabilize x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.8.0-r1. Should we ignore bug 216196?
Alpha AT Report: compiles and runs cleanly :)
(In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Arches, please stabilize x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.8.0-r1. > > Should we ignore bug 216196? Yes, that's a corner case that nobody should care about because it means you can't do direct rendering. I should just force on DRI all the time, but I haven't gotten around to it.
x86 stable
ppc stable
alpha/ia64 stable, thanks Matt for testing
Created attachment 160397 [details] Xorg.0.log, startup failure on sparc64(mach64) On sparc with an ATI 3D Rage XL(SUN PGX64) card I get: (EE) MACH64(0): Unable to register the following bus resources: [0] 0 1 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B] [1] 0 1 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B] (II) UnloadModule: "mach64" (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. I did a little research and found the release anouncement[0] which says that the mach64, r128 and radeon driver have been ported to libpciaccess. Are they supposed to work with a non-libpciaccess based server(1.3.0.0-r6)? If yes, any ideas why these resource conflicts occur? After switching back to 6.6.3 it works fine. [0] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-February/032992.html
(In reply to comment #19) > Created an attachment (id=160397) [edit] > Xorg.0.log, startup failure on sparc64(mach64) > > On sparc with an ATI 3D Rage XL(SUN PGX64) card I get: > (EE) MACH64(0): Unable to register the following bus resources: > [0] 0 1 0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B] > [1] 0 1 0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B] > (II) UnloadModule: "mach64" > (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. > > I did a little research and found the release anouncement[0] which says that > the mach64, r128 and radeon driver have been ported to libpciaccess. Are they > supposed to work with a non-libpciaccess based server(1.3.0.0-r6)? If yes, any > ideas why these resource conflicts occur? After switching back to 6.6.3 it > works fine. That split happened for ati version 6.9, so it shouldn't be relevant here with 6.8. Yes, ati 6.8 is supposed to work without pciaccess. I think there might be some kind of sparc bug open or marked upstream on our Bugzilla right now.
(In reply to comment #20) > That split happened for ati version 6.9, so it shouldn't be relevant here with > 6.8. Yes, ati 6.8 is supposed to work without pciaccess. I think there might be > some kind of sparc bug open or marked upstream on our Bugzilla right now. Are you referring to bug 230953? That one's related to mesa 7.1(6.5 and 7.0 are fine). I talked to another user who experience the same problems as I do(and I found noone who got it working). To sum it up: =xf86-video-ati-6.6.3 works with =xorg-server-1.3.* and =xorg-server-1.4.*. >=xf86-video-ati-6.7.197 works with =xorg-server-1.4.99.* but not with 1.3 or 1.4. Therefore sparc will pass but please invite us again for xf86-video-{ati,mach64} when xorg-server 1.4.99(1.5) is going stable :)
ppc64 stable
arm/sh stable
@amd64, ping?
amd64 stable, all arches done.
