Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 212381
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Kernel Bug Wranglers and Kernel Maintainers <kernel@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
linux-2.6.24-large-sasp-dump.patch linux-2.6.24-large-sasp-dump.patch patch Natanael Copa 2008-03-05 12:51 0000 20.62 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 212381 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 212381 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-03-05 12:51 0000 
In current kernel af_key users (ipsec-tools / racoon) is not able to handle
more than 100-200 concurrent IPsec connections. 

The attatched patch is a backport of the upstream commits finxing this:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.26.git;a=commitdiff;h=83321d6b9872b94604e481a79dc2c8acbe4ece31
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.26.git;a=commitdiff;h=4c563f7669c10a12354b72b518c2287ffc6ebfb3

------- Comment #1 From Natanael Copa 2008-03-05 12:51:48 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=145344) [details]
linux-2.6.24-large-sasp-dump.patch

------- Comment #2 From Natanael Copa 2008-03-05 12:53:50 0000 ------- 
The patch also gives significant system performance improvement when there is
large amount of ipsec connections.

------- Comment #3 From Daniel Drake 2008-03-11 17:04:42 0000 ------- 
Did you have to do anything special with those commits to backport them? They
both seem to apply cleanly (xfrm one first) but I have not tested compiling or
runtime.

------- Comment #4 From Natanael Copa 2008-03-13 08:21:07 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Did you have to do anything special with those commits to backport them? They
> both seem to apply cleanly (xfrm one first) but I have not tested compiling or
> runtime.

I got the pathes from Timo himself and they are only a rebase to avoid noise
about fuzz/diff. He says the raw diffs should work as-is against .24.

------- Comment #5 From Daniel Drake 2008-03-16 20:36:37 0000 ------- 
ok, compile tested and queued for next release

------- Comment #6 From Daniel Drake 2008-03-30 09:20:13 0000 ------- 
Fixed in gentoo-sources-2.6.24-r4 (genpatches-2.6.24-5)
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug