Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 206456 - >sys-apps/busybox-1.7.x compile failure on HPPA due to invalid assumption on signal define values
Summary: >sys-apps/busybox-1.7.x compile failure on HPPA due to invalid assumption on ...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High major (vote)
Assignee: Embedded Gentoo Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-01-17 19:44 UTC by Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED)
Modified: 2008-02-09 22:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-17 19:44:56 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #201114 +++

This problem is still present in 1.8.2. So let's keep this new bug around for clarity's sake and until the issue is fixed upstream or in the tree.

Actually, the 1.7.4 patch applies to 1.8.2, so maybe it's a good idea to propagate it to the 1.8.2 ebuild. Testing that...
Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-17 20:12:01 UTC 
The patch applies, the package builds, installs, bb still works (even kill, e.g. kill -l)...
Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-17 20:26:14 UTC 
Fixed that in CVS. Now wait for upstream...
Comment 3 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2008-01-18 10:52:16 UTC 
yes, i only bothered fixing this for the stable version of busybox on hppa

upstream already fixed things in the latest release, so i wasnt going to bother backporting, just use the new release

if you want to apply it yourself to newer ebuilds, feel free
Comment 4 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2008-02-06 15:15:53 UTC 
someone added the patch to the 1.8.2 ebuild ...
Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-06 16:34:03 UTC 
I did, before I opened this bug. You may want to read this bug's description again <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206456#c0>. :)
Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-07 06:24:55 UTC 
1.9.0 does not use the signal-hack patch. Is it safe to say that it's fixed upstream now?
Comment 7 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2008-02-09 22:55:25 UTC 
please review comment #3