Bugzilla Bug 201984

Hi,

the Haskell team makes another raid and humbly ask to get the following
packages stabilized. They are all found in the category dev-haskell.

These versions of the packages are released upstream together with GHC
6.6.1, which was previously marked stable.  

Thank you!

amd64
=====

alut-2.0.1
arrows-0.2.1
cgi-3001.1.1
fgl-5.4.
glut-2.1.1
haskell-src-1.0.1
html-1.0.1
hunit-1.1.1
mtl-1.0.1
network-2.0.1
openal-1.3.1
opengl-2.2.1
quickcheck-1.0.1
time-1.1.1
xhtml-3000.0.2

ppc
===

arrows-0.2.1
cgi-3001.1.1
fgl-5.4.1
filepath-1.0
haskell-src-1.0.1
html-1.0.1
hunit-1.1.1
mtl-1.0.1
network-2.0.1
quickcheck-1.0.1
regex-base-0.72
regex-compat-0.71
regex-posix-0.71
time-1.1.1
xhtml-3000.0.2

sparc
=====

arrows-0.2.1
cgi-3001.1.1
fgl-5.4.1
filepath-1.0
haskell-src-1.0.1
html-1.0.1
hunit-1.1.1
mtl-1.0.1
network-2.0.1
quickcheck-1.0.1
regex-base-0.72
regex-compat-0.71
regex-posix-0.71
time-1.1.1
xhtml-3000.0.2

x86
===

alut-2.0.1
arrows-0.2.1
cgi-3001.1.1
fgl-5.4.1
glut-2.1.1
haskell-src-1.0.1
html-1.0.1
hunit-1.1.1
mtl-1.0.1
network-2.0.1
openal-1.3.1
opengl-2.2.1
quickcheck-1.0.1
time-1.1.1
xhtml-3000.0.2

x86 stable

Oh and I also correct quoting errors for variables that may contain spaces
(like ${S}, ${D} etc.)...please check your repoman output.

(In reply to comment #1)
> x86 stable

Thanks very much.

(In reply to comment #2)
> Oh and I also correct quoting errors for variables that may contain spaces
> (like ${S}, ${D} etc.)...please check your repoman output.

Oh, sorry about that. These packages were added to portage shortly before that
warning was added to repoman. For all new stuff will of course we'll notice
such warnings.

Sparc stable for the 15 packages listed.  Also, ghc-6.6.1 marked stable on
sparc because it is needed for this effort.  Finally, as a bonus, both opengl
and glut were marked ~sparc for testing; they seem fine.

ppc stable

amd64 stable on listed packages, I assume you meant "fgl-5.4.1" with "fgl-5.4."

fmccor, might be good idea to keyword latest dev-haskell/opengl instead of old
one (2.2.1 got keyworded, 2.2.1.1 is available)

(In reply to comment #6)
> amd64 stable on listed packages, I assume you meant "fgl-5.4.1" with "fgl-5.4."
> 
> fmccor, might be good idea to keyword latest dev-haskell/opengl instead of old
> one (2.2.1 got keyworded, 2.2.1.1 is available)
> 

Done, thanks.  In this case, 2.2.1.1 became available after ~sparc was added to
2.2.1.  Generally, unless there are incompatibilities or other issues with an
upgrade, it's OK to carry along the ~sparc keyword (or, as in this case,
request a rekeyword if there is any reason not to carry the ~sparc along). 
Where we get cranky is the case when a stable 'sparc' keyword gets carried
forward. :)