Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 199740
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
global_list All arch working version of the targeted version list text/plain Mart Raudsepp 2007-11-20 08:24 0000 7.06 KB Details
global_list Final stabling list text/plain Mart Raudsepp 2007-11-20 23:09 0000 7.86 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 199740 depends on: 189307 198845 199322 200659 201276 Show dependency tree
Bug 199740 blocks: 193368 198629
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2007-11-20 08:22 0000
Time to finally finish off with GNOME 2.20 stabling.
A list for each arch will be provided in a few hours, meanwhile I'm attaching
my working (hopefully final) all arch list version for reference.

All this of course depends on the gtk+-2.12 stabling bug and GNOME 2.20
stabling first pass bug being done before this.

------- Comment #1 From Mart Raudsepp 2007-11-20 08:24:29 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=136476) [details]
All arch working version of the targeted version list

(for reference, arch specific lists will follow in subsequent comments)

------- Comment #2 From Samuli Suominen 2007-11-20 11:51:07 0000 -------
- libpcre, and evolution is missing from list.

- "make check" for evolution fails,

The following files contain translations and are currently not in use. Please
consider adding these to the POTFILES.in file, located in the po/ directory.

evolution-addressbook.xml
evolution-calendar.xml
evolution-composer-entries.xml
evolution-editor.xml
evolution-event-editor.xml
evolution-mail-global.xml
evolution-mail-list.xml
evolution-mail-message.xml
evolution-mail-messagedisplay.xml
evolution-memo-editor.xml
evolution-memos.xml
evolution-message-composer.xml
evolution-signature-editor.xml
evolution-subscribe.xml
evolution-task-editor.xml
evolution-tasks.xml
evolution.xml

If some of these files are left out on purpose then please add them to
POTFILES.skip instead of POTFILES.in. A file 'missing' containing this list
of left out files has been written in the current directory.
if [ -r missing -o -r notexist ]; then \
          exit 1; \
        fi
make[1]: *** [check] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
 * 
 * ERROR: mail-client/evolution-2.12.1 failed.

------- Comment #3 From Samuli Suominen 2007-11-20 11:53:33 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> - libpcre, and evolution is missing from list.
> 
> - "make check" for evolution fails,
> 
> The following files contain translations and are currently not in use. Please
> consider adding these to the POTFILES.in file, located in the po/ directory.
> 
> evolution-addressbook.xml
> evolution-calendar.xml
> evolution-composer-entries.xml
> evolution-editor.xml
> evolution-event-editor.xml
> evolution-mail-global.xml
> evolution-mail-list.xml
> evolution-mail-message.xml
> evolution-mail-messagedisplay.xml
> evolution-memo-editor.xml
> evolution-memos.xml
> evolution-message-composer.xml
> evolution-signature-editor.xml
> evolution-subscribe.xml
> evolution-task-editor.xml
> evolution-tasks.xml
> evolution.xml
> 
> If some of these files are left out on purpose then please add them to
> POTFILES.skip instead of POTFILES.in. A file 'missing' containing this list
> of left out files has been written in the current directory.
> if [ -r missing -o -r notexist ]; then \
>           exit 1; \
>         fi
> make[1]: *** [check] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po'
> make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
>  * 
>  * ERROR: mail-client/evolution-2.12.1 failed.
> 

/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 102:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 103:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 104:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 105:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 106:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 107:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 108:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 109:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 110:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 111:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 112:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 113:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 114:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 115:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 116:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 117:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 118:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory

------- Comment #4 From Samuli Suominen 2007-11-20 12:11:35 0000 -------
It's executing these echo lines from src_unpack before source is unpacked,
sys-apps/portage-2.1.3.19.

/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 117:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
/usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 118:
/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
No such file or directory
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking evolution-2.12.1.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work

------- Comment #5 From Samuli Suominen 2007-11-20 12:15:22 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> It's executing these echo lines from src_unpack before source is unpacked,
> sys-apps/portage-2.1.3.19.
> 
> /usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 117:
> /var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
> No such file or directory
> /usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 118:
> /var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
> No such file or directory
> >>> Unpacking source...
> >>> Unpacking evolution-2.12.1.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work
> 

Bah, sorry for bugspam but these echo lines are in (In reply to comment #4)
> It's executing these echo lines from src_unpack before source is unpacked,
> sys-apps/portage-2.1.3.19.
> 
> /usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 117:
> /var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
> No such file or directory
> /usr/portage/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild: line 118:
> /var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work/evolution-2.12.1/po/POTFILES.in:
> No such file or directory
> >>> Unpacking source...
> >>> Unpacking evolution-2.12.1.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/mail-client/evolution-2.12.1/work
> 

Shrug, ignore me.

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/mail-client/evolution/evolution-2.12.1.ebuild?r1=1.5&r2=1.6

It was fixed already.

------- Comment #6 From Mart Raudsepp 2007-11-20 23:09:19 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=136555) [details]
Final stabling list

Best viewed in a plan text viewer/editor with tab size set to 4

------- Comment #7 From Mart Raudsepp 2007-11-20 23:13:03 0000 -------
Arches, please go ahead with GNOME-2.20 stabling as per attachment in comment
#6.
Assumes bugs #198845 and #199322 are done for your arch

------- Comment #8 From Dawid Węgliński 2007-11-21 18:05:48 0000 -------
x86 stable

------- Comment #9 From Raúl Porcel 2007-11-22 15:32:54 0000 -------
alpha/ia64/sparc stable

gnome should die :P

------- Comment #10 From Brent Baude 2007-11-24 23:14:23 0000 -------
ppc stable; chasing the beagle and evo bugs now...

------- Comment #11 From Markus Rothe 2007-11-26 15:15:30 0000 -------
ppc64 stable. Although I ran into the following problem:


while committing galago-daemon-0.5.1:

DEPEND.bad                     1
   sys-apps/galago-daemon/galago-daemon-0.5.1.ebuild:
ppc64(default-linux/ppc/ppc64/2006.1/64bit-userland)
['>=dev-libs/libgalago-0.5.2']

So I tried libgalago-0.5.2 first:

PDEPEND.bad                    1
   dev-libs/libgalago/libgalago-0.5.2.ebuild:
ppc64(default-linux/ppc/ppc64/2006.1/64bit-userland)
['>=sys-apps/galago-daemon-0.5.1']

Haven't seen this situation before. I committed both "at the same time":
keywording one locally without commiting, commiting the other and then
commiting the first one...

------- Comment #12 From Fabian Groffen 2007-11-27 20:34:31 0000 -------
While syncing I just noted this, and I think it is strange...  I hope I don't
keep you guys busy for nothing, but...:

+  26 Nov 2007; Markus Rothe <corsair@gentoo.org> scrollkeeper-9999.ebuild:
+  Stable on ppc64; bug #199740

was it really the intention to stable the cvs snapshot for this bug?

------- Comment #13 From Mart Raudsepp 2007-11-27 20:43:13 0000 -------
No, because it isn't a CVS snapshot.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/gnome/howtos/gnome-2.20-upgrade.xml
Changes chapter, section about Migration to rarian for explanation.

------- Comment #14 From Fabian Groffen 2007-11-27 20:53:56 0000 -------
ohw, ok.  Sorry for the noise.  I'll add that version then.

------- Comment #15 From Jeroen Roovers 2007-12-09 22:57:24 0000 -------
If the GNOME bugzilla bug mentioned in bug #201276 is anything to go by, people
have been testing/stabilising 2.20 against unstable packages (like python-2.5).
Once that bug is fixed, maybe you want to readd those arches that stabilised
2.20 to this bug. Meanwhile, hppa can't go stable until this is fixed.

------- Comment #16 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-12-11 17:31:44 0000 -------
arm/sh done by Mike...what do you need s390 and m86k for, Gnome team?

------- Comment #17 From Mart Raudsepp 2007-12-11 17:40:15 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> arm/sh done by Mike...what do you need s390 and m86k for, Gnome team?

Exactly what is listed in the attachment with an entry in the s390 or m68k
column.

If I need to spell it out separately, then:

s390:
=====
app-text/rarian-0.6.0-r1
app-text/scrollkeeper-9999
dev-libs/libpcre-7.4
gnome-extra/gnome2-user-docs-2.20.1


m68k:
=====
app-text/rarian-0.6.0-r1
app-text/scrollkeeper-9999
dev-libs/libpcre-7.4

------- Comment #18 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-12-11 17:46:44 0000 -------
Done also...man, I am tired about cleaning after vapier...anyway, all done
after his arm/m68k/s390/sh stabilisation/keyword spree.

------- Comment #19 From Mart Raudsepp 2007-12-11 18:02:48 0000 -------
I'm sorry, but none of these arches are done. We need rarian and
scrollkeeper-9999 keyworded and ultimately stabled to complete migration to
rarian and be able to start thinking of how to get rid of scrollkeeper
completely.
arm and s390 also miss gnome-extra/gnome2-user-docs-2.20.1

------- Comment #20 From Jeroen Roovers 2008-01-21 15:35:20 0000 -------
With app-admin/sabayon now keyworded, I think HPPA is done.

------- Comment #21 From Gilles Dartiguelongue 2008-04-23 09:34:05 0000 -------
From the attached list, arm/sh still have those to do (rekeywording mostly):

app-text/scrollkeeper
app-text/rarian
gnome-extra/yelp
media-video/totem
gnome-extra/gnome-games-extra-data
gnome-extra/gnome-utils

------- Comment #22 From Arthur Spitzer 2008-11-20 18:05:01 0000 -------
Hi,

can this bug be closed?

------- Comment #23 From Gilles Dartiguelongue 2009-02-25 20:59:40 0000 -------
this bug is deprecated by bug #214260. Closing.

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug