Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 199493
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Perl Devs @ Gentoo <perl@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Joshua Rich <joshua.rich@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
podbrowser-0.11a.ebuild ebuild for version 0.11a text/plain Joshua Rich 2007-11-18 05:35 0000 952 bytes Details
podbrowser-makefile.patch patch required for ebuild version 0.11a patch Joshua Rich 2007-11-18 05:36 0000 1.41 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 199493 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 199493 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-11-18 05:33 0000 
I'm attaching an updated ebuild for the latest version of podbrowser.  Current
version in portage is 0.09.  This new ebuild is for version 0.11a (released
September this year).

Reproducible: Always

------- Comment #1 From Joshua Rich 2007-11-18 05:35:44 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=136213) [details]
ebuild for version 0.11a

------- Comment #2 From Joshua Rich 2007-11-18 05:36:51 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=136215) [details]
patch required for ebuild version 0.11a

------- Comment #3 From Joshua Rich 2008-03-16 11:04:57 0000 ------- 
There is a new stable version of podbrowser v0.12 and the ebuild for v0.11a
posted on this bug works without any internal changes when renamed.  The patch
is still required.

Regards,

Joshua Rich

------- Comment #4 From Torsten Veller 2008-05-13 11:04:28 0000 ------- 
0.12 is in the tree now.

Is anything wrong with the Makefile already in the files/ directory?

------- Comment #5 From Joshua Rich 2008-05-13 11:48:09 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #4)
> 0.12 is in the tree now.
> 
> Is anything wrong with the Makefile already in the files/ directory?
> 

Hi Torsten,

No, there is nothing wrong with using the Makefile in the files/ directory.  I
was using the patch so I could use epatch on the existing Makefile shipped with
podbrowser rather than overwriting it with the Makefile from $FILESDIR. Either
way achieves the same effect.  Sorry for causing confusion, I should have
explained what the patch was trying to do when I attached it to this bug.

Cheers,

Joshua
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug