Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 198992
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Java team <java@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 198992 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 198992 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2007-11-12 23:36 0000
*commons-io-1.3.2 (03 Aug 2007)

  03 Aug 2007; Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>
  -files/commons-io-1.1-gentoo.diff, +commons-io-1.3.2.ebuild:
  Version bump.

------- Comment #1 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-11-13 07:11:07 0000 -------
    [junit] Testcase: testAgeFilter took 2.016 sec
    [junit]     FAILED
    [junit] Filter(File) org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.AgeFileFilter not
false for /var/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.
2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/new.txt
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Filter(File)
org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.AgeFileFilter not false for /va
r/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/new.txt
    [junit]     at
org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.assertFiltering(FileFilterTestCase.java:69)
    [junit]     at
org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.testAgeFilter(FileFilterTestCase.java:635)
    [junit]
    [junit] Testcase: testSizeFilter took 0.004 sec
    [junit] Testcase: testHidden took 0.002 sec
    [junit] Testcase: testCanRead took 0.004 sec
    [junit]     FAILED
    [junit] Filter(File) org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.AndFileFilter not
true for
/var/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/read-only-file1.txt
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Filter(File)
org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.AndFileFilter not true for
/var/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/read-only-file1.txt
    [junit]     at
org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.assertFiltering(FileFilterTestCase.java:69)
    [junit]     at
org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.testCanRead(FileFilterTestCase.java:703)
    [junit]
    [junit] Testcase: testCanWrite took 0.002 sec
    [junit]     FAILED
    [junit] Filter(File) org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.CanWriteFileFilter
not false for
/var/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/read-only-file2.txt
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Filter(File)
org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.CanWriteFileFilter not false for
/var/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/read-only-file2.txt
    [junit]     at
org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.assertFiltering(FileFilterTestCase.java:69)
    [junit]     at
org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.testCanWrite(FileFilterTestCase.java:713)
    [junit]
    [junit] Testcase: testEmpty took 0.004 sec

Without FEATURES=userpriv, there is one test failure less (the first one). 
Tested with eclass patch from bug 142538, 1.3.1 succeeds.

------- Comment #2 From Dawid Węgliński 2007-11-17 23:50:30 0000 -------
Everything passes here.
x86 stable

------- Comment #3 From Markus Rothe 2007-11-18 17:50:51 0000 -------
ppc64 stable

------- Comment #4 From William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED) 2007-11-19 18:27:19 0000 -------
amd64 stable

------- Comment #5 From Samuli Suominen 2007-11-24 17:43:27 0000 -------
Reproduced the test failure here in amd64.. I wonder why it was marked stable.

------- Comment #6 From Petteri Räty 2007-11-24 17:55:45 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Reproduced the test failure here in amd64.. I wonder why it was marked stable.
> 

Yeah I don't know why people did that. Any way I fixed them.

------- Comment #7 From Petteri Räty 2007-11-24 17:56:30 0000 -------
ppc still left, reopening

------- Comment #8 From William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED) 2007-11-24 20:55:23 0000 -------
I marked it stable because first time I tested package it failed tests. Then
time went by, I think a week or so. Other archs marked it stable. I re-ran
tests, they passed. I compiled deps against package, etc and so on. I saw no
problems, thus marked it stable.

------- Comment #9 From Krzysiek Pawlik 2007-11-25 09:34:01 0000 -------
ppc done, closing bug as we're the last arch.

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug