Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 198753 - net-misc/neon-0.27.2 released
Summary: net-misc/neon-0.27.2 released
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Apache Team - Bugzilla Reports
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-11-10 23:04 UTC by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED)
Modified: 2008-04-04 17:20 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
neon-0.27.2 ebuild (neon-0.27.2.ebuild,2.53 KB, text/plain)
2007-11-26 18:24 UTC, Christian Birchinger (RETIRED)
Details
updated neon-0.27.2 ebuild (neon-0.27.2.ebuild,2.50 KB, text/plain)
2007-11-26 19:20 UTC, Christian Birchinger (RETIRED)
Details
Patch for subversion-1.4.5 to build with neon 0.27.2 (subversion-neon-0.27.patch,1.60 KB, patch)
2007-11-27 16:17 UTC, Christian Birchinger (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-10 23:04:53 UTC
net-misc/neon-0.27.2 was released on 2007-09-25.
Comment 1 Christian Birchinger (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-26 18:24:10 UTC
Created attachment 137062 [details]
neon-0.27.2 ebuild

New version with support for gnutls (instead of openssl).

This version should probably be hard masked as subversion doesn't even build
with it.

It would still be useful, because it fixed Audacious streaming problems.
Comment 2 Christian Birchinger (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-26 19:20:05 UTC
Created attachment 137068 [details]
updated neon-0.27.2 ebuild

cosmetic configure option fixes
Comment 3 Christian Birchinger (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-27 16:17:28 UTC
Created attachment 137125 [details, diff]
Patch for subversion-1.4.5 to build with neon 0.27.2

This patch against subversion 1.4.5 makes it build here with neon 0.27.2
It seems to be just m4 magic for the version detection. Guess it did default
to 0.25 compatibility when anything but 0.26 was found.

Of course a 0.27.2 add to the "NEON_ALLOWED_LIST" is also needed.

I'm no big svn user so i don't know what tests would be needed.
I did a svn co on a http:// repository and that worked fine.

(I'm not the author of this patch, so at least the Arch Linux
folks seems to use it just fine)
Comment 4 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-14 20:43:54 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=137125) [edit]
> Patch for subversion-1.4.5 to build with neon 0.27.2

This patch contains wrong quoting and is slightly insufficient.

r27007 from Subversion trunk could be adjusted to Subversion 1.4.5:
svn di -c27007 https://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk
Comment 5 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-14 20:54:51 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> New version with support for gnutls (instead of openssl).

Are you sure that Bug #140676 and Bug #148306 won't reappear?
Comment 6 Christian Birchinger (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-22 18:00:38 UTC
I don't know. I'm no subversion expert. I only tested the client after making it build with newer neon. If you're worried, you can remove gnutls support again.
The reason i tried to get those 2 versions working with each other was because the newer neon works better with Audacious.
Comment 7 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-09 01:50:17 UTC
Apache team, can we get this soon, but hard masked into the tree, plus some tracker bug, please!? There are a number of packages using neon and they'll need pacthing, too.
Comment 8 Benedikt Böhm (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-27 19:28:53 UTC
in cvs now, and hard masked
Comment 9 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2008-04-04 15:09:39 UTC
subversion-1.4.6 builds fine against neon-0.28.1 ... perhaps time to unmask
Comment 10 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-04-04 17:20:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> subversion-1.4.6 builds fine against neon-0.28.1

See Bug #210535.

(In reply to comment #9)
> perhaps time to unmask

+1