First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 196879
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Kernel Bug Wranglers and Kernel Maintainers <kernel@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Sergey A. Sukiyazov <sukiyazov@mail.ru>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
scsi.patch patch patch Daniel Drake 2008-01-24 13:20 0000 3.48 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 196879 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 196879 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-10-24 06:29 0000 
>From  David Martin <>
  Subject  [PATCH] SCSI not showing tray status correctly
  Date  Mon, 27 Dec 2004 06:26:32 +0100
Digg This  When trying to get the drive status via ioctl CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS,
with no disk 
it gives CDS_TRAY_OPEN even if the tray is closed.

ioctl works as expected with ide-cd driver. Here is the patch to get the same 
behaviour on SCSI drives for kernel 2.6.10. 2.4 branch have same problem.

Get from Debian bug #447337
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=447337)

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Close empty CD tray.
2. call state = ioctl(device_handle, CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS);
3. state always gives CDS_TRAY_OPEN even if the tray is closed.



Patch for solve this problem present at Debian bug #447337 by URL:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=447337

I apply this patch. It work correctly. Now ioctl(device_handle,
CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS) returns right result.

------- Comment #1 From Mike Pagano 2007-10-25 00:24:03 0000 ------- 
Submission of patch to lkml:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/27/1

------- Comment #2 From Maarten Bressers 2007-10-25 22:35:50 0000 ------- 
The patch has been sent upstream (again), we'll wait for their response.

------- Comment #3 From Mike Pagano 2007-12-19 19:23:18 0000 ------- 
submission thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/27/219

------- Comment #4 From Daniel Drake 2008-01-24 13:20:30 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=141718) [details]
patch

Sorry for the delay here.
Please apply this patch instead, and confirm it solves the issue.

------- Comment #5 From Daniel Drake 2008-02-07 11:49:22 0000 ------- 
I went ahead and tested this myself. It needed some extra work (another patch
backported first, and a fix applying after), but it's done now. Patches 2100,
2101, and 2102 queued for next gentoo-sources-2.6.24 release

------- Comment #6 From Daniel Drake 2008-02-10 00:39:13 0000 ------- 
Fixed in gentoo-sources-2.6.24-r1 (genpatches-2.6.24-2)
Not planning on backporting to 2.6.23 as this is more than a simple bugfix.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug