First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 19681
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Aron Griffis (RETIRED) <agriffis@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Neil McCalden <nmcc@zizz.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
epm-qspecific.patch make epm -q version aware patch Neil McCalden 2003-04-20 12:58 0000 687 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 19681 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 19681 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-04-20 12:54 0000 
Do epm -q slocate-2.7-r1 when slocate-2.7-r2 is installed returns
slocate-2.7-r1 as if it was installed.



Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Find package with older ebuild
2. epm -q package-installed-ver
3. epm -q package-old-ver



Expected Results:  
I believe it should return 'not installed'. This allows scripts to check
postively if a given version is installed eg: checking for old packages in
pakages/All directory. Would also be consistent with RPM output.



I have a patch which makes -q test the version if specified on command line.

------- Comment #1 From Neil McCalden 2003-04-20 12:58:42 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=10921) [edit]
make epm -q  version aware

------- Comment #2 From Aron Griffis (RETIRED) 2003-04-23 21:28:44 0000 ------- 
Thanks, I fixed this in cvs as 0.8.1.  The patch is much appreciated.

------- Comment #3 From Wayne Davison 2003-04-24 15:25:21 0000 ------- 
Note that the epm ChangeLog for 0.8.1 refers to bug 19438, not this bug.

Also, I'd love to see my 4-month-old epm patches (see bug 8832 and
bug 12798) get incorporated into epm -- should these bugs be
reassigned to you, Aron?

------- Comment #4 From Aron Griffis (RETIRED) 2003-04-24 15:59:11 0000 ------- 
Yes, please assign epm bugs to me.  And thanks regarding the ChangeLog, I'll
fix it.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug