Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 196481
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Robert Buchholz <rbu@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 196481 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 196481 blocks: 199299

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2007-10-20 02:22 0000
Secunia:
  Some vulnerabilities have been reported in Mozilla Thunderbird,
  which potentially can be exploited by malicious people to compromise
  a user's system.

  1) Various errors in the browser engine can be exploited to cause
     a memory corruption.
  2) Various errors in the Javascript engine can be exploited to cause
     a memory corruption.
  Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities may allow execution
  of arbitrary code.

Fixed in Thunderbird 2.0.0.8

------- Comment #1 From Robert Buchholz 2007-10-20 02:23:07 0000 -------
Mozilla, please advise.

------- Comment #2 From Robert Buchholz 2007-10-24 22:29:36 0000 -------
Should we bump the package ourselves? The patches are available without a lot
of hassle.

------- Comment #3 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2007-10-25 06:34:14 0000 -------
In general we should bump packages if maintainers don't respond in a timely
manner. Though we should try to poke them on IRC at least beforehand.

------- Comment #4 From Robert Buchholz 2007-10-25 07:32:09 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> In general we should bump packages if maintainers don't respond in a timely
> manner. Though we should try to poke them on IRC at least beforehand.

Seems I wasn't clear enough. I meant we (Gentoo's mozilla herd) should bump it
since Mozilla upstream did not release yet.

------- Comment #5 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2007-10-25 07:36:19 0000 -------
Oh, I'm confusing roles here. I won't stand in the way of the herd bumping it's
package:)

------- Comment #6 From Raúl Porcel 2007-10-25 10:26:28 0000 -------
Where are the patches?

------- Comment #7 From Robert Buchholz 2007-10-28 15:07:11 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Where are the patches?

Debian ships some for 1.5 which are pretty much undocumented because of the
embargo. Ubuntu released a "pre" snapshot. In light of the other regressions
you mentioned we should probably wait for upstream.

------- Comment #8 From Raúl Porcel 2007-11-15 15:11:48 0000 -------
In CVS

To be done:
mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.9
x11-plugins/enigmail-0.95.3-r1
mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-bin-2.0.0.9

------- Comment #9 From Robert Buchholz 2007-11-15 16:05:58 0000 -------
Arches, please test and mark stable mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.9.
Target keywords : "alpha amd64 ia64 mips ppc ppc64 sparc x86"

x11-plugins/enigmail-0.95.5-r1.
Target keywords : "alpha amd64 ia64 mips ppc ppc64 sparc x86"

mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-bin-2.0.0.9:
Target keywords : "amd64 x86"

------- Comment #10 From Mat 2007-11-15 20:21:56 0000 -------
compiled and seems to work fine (still testing):

genlop -t mozilla-thunderbird
 * mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird

     Thu Nov 15 21:17:42 2007 >>> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.9
       merge time: 18 minutes and 44 seconds.


Portage 2.1.3.19 (default-linux/amd64/2007.0, gcc-4.2.2, glibc-2.7-r0,
2.6.23-kamikaze5-amd64 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.23-kamikaze5-amd64 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @
2.40GHz
Timestamp of tree: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:30:01 +0000
app-shells/bash:     3.2_p17-r1
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.1.2-r1
dev-lang/python:     2.4.4-r6
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r6
sys-apps/baselayout: 2.0.0_rc6
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.18.1-r2
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.61-r1
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r3, 2.18-r1
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.4.0-r4
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.24
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.22-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 ~amd64"
CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"

------- Comment #11 From Markus Meier 2007-11-15 21:16:42 0000 -------
x86 stable

------- Comment #12 From Steve Dibb 2007-11-15 23:47:27 0000 -------
amd64 stable

------- Comment #13 From Raúl Porcel 2007-11-16 15:48:35 0000 -------
alpha/ia64/sparc stable

i said enigmail-0.95.3-r1, but .5 is fine as well :)

------- Comment #14 From Markus Rothe 2007-11-18 13:39:29 0000 -------
ppc64 stable

------- Comment #15 From Tobias Scherbaum 2007-11-18 15:38:06 0000 -------
ppc stable

------- Comment #16 From Pierre-Yves Rofes 2007-11-18 21:33:45 0000 -------
GLSA 200711-24

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug