Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 194240
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Mozilla Gentoo Team <mozilla@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Chris Slycord <cslycord@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
the_diff diff enigmail-0.95.3.ebuild enigmail-0.95.3.ebuild.orig text/plain Chris Slycord 2007-09-30 02:26 0000 1.23 KB Details
the_diff Here's the unified diff text/plain Chris Slycord 2007-09-30 07:11 0000 1.56 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 194240 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 194240 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-09-30 02:20 0000 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #193793 +++

During the compile phase for x11-plugins/enigmail (version 0.95.3), gcc is
invoked instead of a CHOST-specific command (like i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc). This
could cause troubles if trying to do, say, a cross-compile and the system gcc
gets called (since normally it would use the CHOST for the cross compiler).

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install 0.95.3
2. Look at output during compile phase
3.

Actual Results:  
gcc is invoked at one time and later c++ as well

Expected Results:  
A CHOST-specific compiler name to be invoked

NOTE: A simple ebuild fix to follow

------- Comment #1 From Chris Slycord 2007-09-30 02:26:56 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=132208) [details]
diff enigmail-0.95.3.ebuild enigmail-0.95.3.ebuild.orig

Fixes issue on my computer

------- Comment #2 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-09-30 06:41:11 0000 ------- 
The patch is once again reversed. *Please* use unified diffs.

------- Comment #3 From Chris Slycord 2007-09-30 07:11:01 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=132209) [details]
Here's the unified diff

------- Comment #4 From Raúl Porcel 2007-10-16 17:26:43 0000 ------- 
Fixed, thanks
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug