Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 191302
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 191302 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 191302 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-09-04 21:30 0000 
Recently dhcdbd was stablized, however it does not work with dhcp 3.1 please
stablize this version.  Also, NetworkManager 0.6.5_pXXXXXXXXX is a much better
version than the one that was recently stablized, so if you are feeling
frogish, and have some spare time, if you could stable that one instead...

Reproducible: Always

------- Comment #1 From Wulf Krueger (RETIRED) 2007-09-05 20:39:37 0000 ------- 
After extensive testing, I've marked stable both dhcdbd-3.0 and
networkmanager-0.6.5_p20070823 on amd64 in spite of the usual 30 days for the
reasons given by steev and considering that stable was impaired before and is
less likely to be so now with the new versions being stable.

------- Comment #2 From Olivier Crete 2007-09-05 21:23:47 0000 ------- 
I'm marking it stable on x86, because non-working networkmanager is very
annoying.. I'll let the x86 team in cc if they want to mark the _p for nm (you
should!).

------- Comment #3 From Joe Jezak 2007-09-08 15:49:25 0000 ------- 
Marked nm and dhcdbd ppc stable.

------- Comment #4 From Robert Buchholz 2007-09-08 16:52:37 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm marking it stable on x86, because non-working networkmanager is very
> annoying.. I'll let the x86 team in cc if they want to mark the _p for nm (you
> should!).

x86: are you going with the networkmanager-0.6.5_p20070823 stable? If that is
not your intention, this bug can be closed.

------- Comment #5 From Markus Meier 2007-09-16 09:17:54 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #4)
> x86: are you going with the networkmanager-0.6.5_p20070823 stable? If that is
> not your intention, this bug can be closed.

nm stable on x86, closing
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug