Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 191142
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Markus Ullmann <jokey@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: brot <schnitzelkuchen@googlemail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
virtualbox-1.5.0.ebuild virtualbox-1.5.0.ebuild text/plain Bernard Cafarelli 2007-09-04 06:24 0000 4.48 KB Details
virtualbox-1.4_to_1.5_ebuild.patch some changes in ebuild is necesary, previous does not work for my. patch Pinky 2007-09-04 16:28 0000 703 bytes Details | Diff
virtualbox-1.5.0-remove-splitted-stuff.patch 1.5.0 version of stuff patch patch Pinky 2007-09-04 16:46 0000 1.35 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 191142 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 191142 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-09-03 11:31 0000 
Today the new virtualbox was released and it looks very promising. A new ebuild
would be great :)

Reproducible: Always

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-09-03 13:50:21 0000 ------- 
Kindly review http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml#doc_chap6
(Zero-day bump requests)

------- Comment #2 From brot 2007-09-03 15:11:25 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Kindly review http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml#doc_chap6
> (Zero-day bump requests)
> 

sorry, didnt know that.

------- Comment #3 From Mat 2007-09-03 15:55:31 0000 ------- 
how about renaming / modifying old ebuilds, testing them and reporting results
here ?

is bugzilla the right place for that ?

------- Comment #4 From Patrick 2007-09-04 00:44:23 0000 ------- 
I copied the 1.4.0-r1 ebuild of virtualbox-bin to my local overlay and renamed
it to 1.5.0 - works out of the box (the same has to be done with
virtualbox-modules-1.4.0 --> virtualbox-modules-1.5.0).

------- Comment #5 From Bernard Cafarelli 2007-09-04 06:24:19 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=129973) [details]
virtualbox-1.5.0.ebuild

Renaming the ebuild is enough for virtualbox-additions and virtualbox-modules,
here is one for virtualbox (tarball name has changed, point to 1.4.0 patches in
src_unpack)

------- Comment #6 From Bernhard Frauendienst 2007-09-04 16:25:21 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=129973) [edit] [details]
> virtualbox-1.5.0.ebuild
> 
> Renaming the ebuild is enough for virtualbox-additions and virtualbox-modules,
> here is one for virtualbox (tarball name has changed, point to 1.4.0 patches in
> src_unpack)
> 

virtualbox-1.5.0 emerged fine with that ebuild on my ~amd64 machine (and the
virtualbox-modules-1.4.0 ebuild renamed), haven't had the time to start it
though ;)
Will report back when I started a VM (successfully I hope).

------- Comment #7 From Pinky 2007-09-04 16:28:35 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=130009) [details]
some changes in ebuild is necesary, previous does not work for my.

------- Comment #8 From Pinky 2007-09-04 16:46:48 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=130012) [details]
1.5.0 version of stuff patch

------- Comment #9 From Pinky 2007-09-04 16:47:09 0000 ------- 
alsa patch not tested. rename needed ....

------- Comment #10 From Bernhard Frauendienst 2007-09-04 17:49:47 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> Will report back when I started a VM (successfully I hope).
> 

There. I just successfully installed a virtual machine, runs great (better than
some proprietary virtualization solutions I tried). Seamless Windows are
interesting, although it just means the background is getting transparent, so
you don't really have "windows" on your desktop (especially not in your task
bar), but I guess I just expected too much :)

I know it's not even 48h since the release, so this is still kinda zero-day,
but I guess that ebuild from comment #5 could be put into into portage after
being checked by someone with a little more insight than me ;)

------- Comment #11 From Markus Ullmann 2007-09-04 23:46:49 0000 ------- 
Bumped in cvs now

------- Comment #12 From Markus Ullmann 2007-09-05 07:17:34 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 191335 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug